Literature DB >> 29663185

Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.

Klaus Jaffe1.   

Abstract

Computer experiments that mirror the evolutionary dynamics of sexual and asexual organisms as they occur in nature were used to test features proposed to explain the evolution of sexual recombination. Results show that this evolution is better described as a network of interactions between possible sexual forms, including diploidy, thelytoky, facultative sex, assortation, bisexuality, and division of labor between the sexes, rather than a simple transition from parthenogenesis to sexual recombination. Diploidy was shown to be fundamental for the evolution of sex; bisexual reproduction emerged only among anisogamic diploids with a synergistic division of reproductive labor; and facultative sex was more likely to evolve among haploids practicing assortative mating. Looking at the evolution of sex as a complex system through individual-based simulations explains better the diversity of sexual strategies known to exist in nature, compared to classical analytical models.

Keywords:  Anisogamy; Assortation; Diploid; Evolution; Recombination; Sex; Synergy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663185      PMCID: PMC6082804          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-018-9485-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  43 in total

1.  On sex, mate selection and the red queen.

Authors:  G Ochoa; K Jaffé
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  On the relative importance of haplodiploidy, assortative mating and social synergy on the evolutionary emergence of social behavior.

Authors:  K Jaffe
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids.

Authors:  François Balloux; Laurent Lehmann; Thierry de Meeûs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Diploid versus haploid models of neutral speciation.

Authors:  David M Schneider; Elizabeth M Baptestini; Marcus A M de Aguiar
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  What sparked the Cambrian explosion?

Authors:  Douglas Fox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift.

Authors:  Christoph R Haag; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind.

Authors:  David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR KIN SELECTION.

Authors:  David C Queller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Michael J McDonald; Daniel P Rice; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.