Literature DB >> 26755353

Diploid versus haploid models of neutral speciation.

David M Schneider1, Elizabeth M Baptestini2, Marcus A M de Aguiar2.   

Abstract

Neutral models of speciation based on isolation by distance and assortative mating, termed topopatric, have shown to be successful in describing abundance distributions and species-area relationships. Previous works have considered this type of process in the context of haploid genomes. Here we discuss the implementation of two schemes of dominance to analyze the effects of diploidy: a complete dominance model in which one allele dominates over the other and a perfect codominant model in which heterozygous genotypes give rise to a third phenotype. In the case of complete dominance, we observe that speciation requires stronger spatial inbreeding in comparison to the haploid model. For perfect codominance, instead, speciation demands stronger genetic assortativeness. Nevertheless, once speciation is established, the three models predict the same abundance distributions even at the quantitative level, revealing the robustness of the original mechanism to describe biodiversity features.

Keywords:  Assortative mating; Individual-based simulations; Models of dominance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26755353      PMCID: PMC4788626          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-015-9404-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  26 in total

1.  Nonlocal interaction effects on pattern formation in population dynamics.

Authors:  M A Fuentes; M N Kuperman; V M Kenkre
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Moran model as a dynamical process on networks and its implications for neutral speciation.

Authors:  Marcus A M de Aguiar; Yaneer Bar-Yam
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-09-01

3.  Evolution and instability in ring species complexes: an in silico approach to the study of speciation.

Authors:  Daniel Ashlock; Elizabeth L Clare; Taika E von Königslöw; Wendy Ashlock
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance.

Authors:  M Kimura; G H Weiss
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Understanding clustering in type space using field theoretic techniques.

Authors:  Daniel John Lawson; Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  The shape of the competition and carrying capacity kernels affects the likelihood of disruptive selection.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Baptestini; Marcus A M de Aguiar; Daniel I Bolnick; Márcio S Araújo
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Global patterns of speciation and diversity.

Authors:  M A M de Aguiar; M Baranger; E M Baptestini; L Kaufman; Y Bar-Yam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Models of speciation: where are we now?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle.

Authors:  M Eigen; P Schuster
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1977-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Synergy from reproductive division of labor and genetic complexity drive the evolution of sex.

Authors:  Klaus Jaffe
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.365

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.