| Literature DB >> 29661226 |
Martin Lukindu1, Christina M Bergey1, Rachel M Wiltshire1, Scott T Small1, Brian P Bourke1, Jonathan K Kayondo2, Nora J Besansky3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding population genetic structure in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (s.s.) is crucial to inform genetic control and manage insecticide resistance. Unfortunately, species characteristics such as high nucleotide diversity, large effective population size, recent range expansion, and high dispersal ability complicate the inference of genetic structure across its range in sub-Saharan Africa. The ocean, along with the Great Rift Valley, is one of the few recognized barriers to gene flow in this species, but the effect of inland lakes, which could be useful sites for initial testing of genetic control strategies, is relatively understudied. Here we examine Lake Victoria as a barrier between the Ugandan mainland and the Ssese Islands, which lie up to 60 km offshore. We use mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from populations sampled in 2002, 2012 and 2015, and perform Bayesian cluster analysis on mtDNA combined with microsatellite data previously generated from the same 2002 mosquito DNA samples.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles gambiae; Gene flow; Lacustrine islands; Malaria; Mitochondrial DNA; Population genetic structure; Uganda
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29661226 PMCID: PMC5902950 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2826-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map showing location of sampling sites in the Lake Victoria Basin of Uganda. More detailed information is provided in Table 1
Mitochondrial samples and sequence polymorphism summary statistics
| Site (CODE) | Coordinates (Lat, Long) | Year (MG/ |
| Π ± SD | θ | Hd ± SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wamalaa | 0.3459, 32.0541 | 2015 (MG) | 11 | 0.004 ± 0.0003 | 0.005 | 0.982 ± 0.046 | -1.411 |
| 2015 ( | 11 | 0.006 ± 0.0013 | 0.008 | 0.945 ± 0.054 | -0.912 | ||
| 2012 ( | 27 | 0.004 ± 0.0006 | 0.006 | 0.855 ± 0.060 | -1.232 | ||
| 2002 ( | 17 | 0.005 ± 0.0010 | 0.009 | 0.875 ± 0.070 | -1.540 | ||
| Buwamaa | 0.0631, 32.1031 | 2015 (MG) | 11 | 0.003 ± 0.0002 | 0.005 | 1.000 ± 0.039 | -1.615 |
| 2015 ( | 11 | 0.007 ± 0.0011 | 0.008 | 0.964 ± 0.051 | -0.951 | ||
| 2012 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2002 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Kaazia | -0.3183, 31.8818 | 2015 (MG) | 11 | 0.004 ± 0.0004 | 0.005 | 0.982 ± 0.046 | -1.445 |
| 2015 ( | 11 | 0.007 ± 0.0010 | 0.008 | 0.945 ± 0.066 | -0.683 | ||
| 2012 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2002 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Kiyindia | 0.2776, 33.1459 | 2015 (MG) | 10 | 0.003 ± 0.0002 | 0.005 | 1.000 ± 0.045 | -1.494 |
| 2015 ( | 10 | 0.008 ± 0.0013 | 0.010 | 0.978 ± 0.054 | -1.093 | ||
| 2012 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2002 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Entebbea | 0.0613, 32.4544 | 2015 ( | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2015 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2012 ( | 32 | 0.005 ± 0.0007 | 0.008 | 0.935 ± 0.021 | -0.910 | ||
| 2002 ( | 22 | 0.005 ± 0.0006 | 0.008 | 0.952 ± 0.037 | -1.193 | ||
| Bukasa | -0.4428, 32.4994 | 2015 (MG) | 11 | 0.003 ± 0.0003 | 0.003 | 0.927 ± 0.066 | -0.322 |
| 2015 ( | 11 | 0.006 ± 0.0009 | 0.005 | 0.855 ± 0.085 | 0.710 | ||
| 2012 ( | 32 | 0.006 ± 0.0006 | 0.006 | 0.885 ± 0.039 | -0.737 | ||
| 2002 ( | 28 | 0.005 ± 0.0005 | 0.006 | 0.934 ± 0.027 | -0.708 | ||
| Bugala | -0.4369, 32.2436 | 2015 (MG) | 23 | 0.003 ± 0.0002 | 0.006 | 0.968 ± 0.026 | -1.827b |
| 2015 ( | 23 | 0.005 ± 0.0005 | 0.008 | 0.945 ± 0.027 | -1.128 | ||
| 2012 ( | 32 | 0.006 ± 0.0006 | 0.008 | 0.925 ± 0.028 | -0.860 | ||
| 2002 ( | 26 | 0.005 ± 0.0006 | 0.007 | 0.942 ± 0.022 | -1.017 | ||
| Nsadzi | -0.0901, 32.5979 | 2015 (MG) | 12 | 0.003 ± 0.0003 | 0.003 | 0.833 ± 0.100 | -0.433 |
| 2015 ( | 12 | 0.008 ± 0.0008 | 0.007 | 0.818 ± 0.100 | 0.391 | ||
| 2012 ( | 37 | 0.006 ± 0.0005 | 0.005 | 0.875 ± 0.028 | 0.470 | ||
| 2002 ( | 30 | 0.006 ± 0.0007 | 0.006 | 0.915 ± 0.023 | -0.255 | ||
| Banda | -0.2581, 32.4003 | 2015 (MG) | 11 | 0.003 ± 0.0028 | 0.004 | 0.927 ± 0.066 | -0.476 |
| 2015 ( | 11 | 0.006 ± 0.0006 | 0.005 | 0.891 ± 0.092 | 0.269 | ||
| 2012 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2002 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Sserinnya | -0.2445, 32.3543 | 2015 (MG) | 14 | 0.006 ± 0.0004 | 0.004 | 0.890 ± 0.060 | -0.855 |
| 2015 ( | 14 | 0.004 ± 0.0003 | 0.005 | 0.923 ± 0.050 | 0.290 | ||
| 2012 ( | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2002 ( | 26 | 0.006 ± 0.0007 | 0.008 | 0.954 ± 0.022 | -1.033 |
aMainland sites
bP < 0.05
Abbreviations: MG protein-coding mitogenome, nad5 fragment of mtDNA nad5 gene, n number of mosquitoes in sample, π nucleotide diversity per site, SD standard deviation, θ theta (per site) from S (number of segregating sites), Hd haplotype (gene) diversity, D Tajima’s D
Summary of spatial population genetic differentiation (global FST) inferred from mtDNA
| Year (MG/ | Among mainland | Among islands | Island-Mainland |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 (MG) | -0.004ns | 0.056*** | 0.059*** |
| 2015 ( | -0.012ns | 0.071** | 0.071** |
| 2012 ( | 0.025ns | 0.046** | 0.065*** |
| 2002 ( | -0.007ns | 0.011ns | 0.077*** |
Abbreviations: MG protein-coding mitogenome, nad5 fragment of mtDNA nad5 gene, ns not significant
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 2Heatmap of pairwise FST values inferred from the protein-coding mitogenome. Values statistically different from zero (P < 0.05) are indicated with an asterisk. Population codes from islands are in blue font
Fig. 3Bayesian clustering analysis of combined 2002 microsatellite and mtDNA data from the same mosquito specimens. a The optimal number of clusters (K) was two based on the method of Evanno et al. [55]. b Bar plots with individual mosquitoes represented as vertical bars colored in proportion to their assignment to clusters inferred at each value of K (from 2 to 6). Individuals from the same population sample are grouped, with groups bounded by vertical black lines. Population labels are in blue font for islands and black font for mainland samples
Hierarchical AMOVA of mtDNA nad5 variation within and among three island populations and three sampling periods (years)a
| Scenario | Hierarchical level | Variation (%) | Φ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Clustered Within Islands | Among islands | 0.62 | ΦCT 0.0062 | 0.254 |
| Among years within islands | 4.55 | ΦSC 0.0458 | < 0.001 | |
| Within subpopulations | 94.83 | ΦST 0.0517 | < 0.001 | |
| Islands Clustered Within Years | Among years | 0.11 | ΦCT 0.0011 | 0.285 |
| Among islands within years | 4.94 | ΦSC 0.0495 | < 0.001 | |
| Within subpopulations | 94.94 | ΦST 0.0506 | < 0.001 |
aIslands of Bugala, Bukasa and Nsadzi, in 2002, 2012 and 2015.
bProbability of obtaining a more extreme Φ value by chance alone, determined by 1000 random permutations in Arlequin 3.5
Fig. 4Mitochondrial DNA nad5 haplotype TCS network based on the 2015 sample from this study and additional nad5 sequences sampled from previous studies in Senegal, Kenya, Tanzania, and the Comoros [20, 37, 56] downloaded from GenBank. Each observed haplotype is indicated by a filled circle, sized according to its frequency and colored according to the location(s) where it was sampled. Inferred (unobserved) haplotypes are indicated by small black circles. Haplotype relationships are indicated by lines; mutational steps between haplotypes are represented by the number of hatches
Geographical population structure indicated by FST. Mean of pairwise FST values reported by cited studies, unless noted
| Contrast | Distance (km) | mtDNA | Microsatellites | SNP/SNP Array |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mainland | 5–100 | 0.017 [37] | 0.0039a–0.013b | – |
| 200–800 | 0.032 [37] | 0.0064a–0.031b | – | |
| 1000–7000 | 0.085 [37] | 0.0161a–0.039b | 0.023g | |
| Main-Oceanic | 50–100 | – | 0.0238c | 0–0.016h |
| 300–400 | – | 0.050d | – | |
| 600–800 | – | – | 0.20–0.25h | |
| Main-Lacustrine | 2–20 | – | 0.003e | – |
| 25–100 | 0.059–0.077 | 0.070f (0.062) | – |
aAverage across 9 loci from [16], only comparisons within NW and SE subdivisions for An. gambiae (S-form)
bAverage across 13 chromosome-3 loci from [17], only comparisons within An. gambiae (S-form) excluding Mozambique
cAverage across 8 chromosome-3 loci from [19], only comparison within An. gambiae (S-form) between Tiko (mainland) and island site
dAverage across 11 chromosome-3 loci from [21], only comparison within An. gambiae (S-form) between Libreville (mainland) and island site
eGlobal FST for 6 loci between 7 island and 6 mainland villages, from [24]
fAverage across 17 loci from [25], only comparisons between island versus mainland sites; smaller value in parenthesis is average across 13 loci after removal of 4 in neighborhood of inversions (Table 6 of [25])
gBased on whole genome sequences from [9], comparisons limited to An. gambiae (S-form) excluding Kenya
hBased on 52- and 31-SNP arrays from [20]