Literature DB >> 16629801

What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity.

Robin S Waples1, Oscar Gaggiotti.   

Abstract

We review commonly used population definitions under both the ecological paradigm (which emphasizes demographic cohesion) and the evolutionary paradigm (which emphasizes reproductive cohesion) and find that none are truly operational. We suggest several quantitative criteria that might be used to determine when groups of individuals are different enough to be considered 'populations'. Units for these criteria are migration rate (m) for the ecological paradigm and migrants per generation (Nm) for the evolutionary paradigm. These criteria are then evaluated by applying analytical methods to simulated genetic data for a finite island model. Under the standard parameter set that includes L = 20 High mutation (microsatellite-like) loci and samples of S = 50 individuals from each of n = 4 subpopulations, power to detect departures from panmixia was very high ( approximately 100%; P < 0.001) even with high gene flow (Nm = 25). A new method, comparing the number of correct population assignments with the random expectation, performed as well as a multilocus contingency test and warrants further consideration. Use of Low mutation (allozyme-like) markers reduced power more than did halving S or L. Under the standard parameter set, power to detect restricted gene flow below a certain level X (H(0): Nm < X) can also be high, provided that true Nm < or = 0.5X. Developing the appropriate test criterion, however, requires assumptions about several key parameters that are difficult to estimate in most natural populations. Methods that cluster individuals without using a priori sampling information detected the true number of populations only under conditions of moderate or low gene flow (Nm < or = 5), and power dropped sharply with smaller samples of loci and individuals. A simple algorithm based on a multilocus contingency test of allele frequencies in pairs of samples has high power to detect the true number of populations even with Nm = 25 but requires more rigorous statistical evaluation. The ecological paradigm remains challenging for evaluations using genetic markers, because the transition from demographic dependence to independence occurs in a region of high migration where genetic methods have relatively little power. Some recent theoretical developments and continued advances in computational power provide hope that this situation may change in the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16629801     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02890.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  227 in total

1.  Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations.

Authors:  T M Baye; R A Wilke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  Population divergence and gene flow in an endangered and highly mobile seabird.

Authors:  A J Welch; R C Fleischer; H F James; A E Wiley; P H Ostrom; J Adams; F Duvall; N Holmes; D Hu; J Penniman; K A Swindle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  An empirical assessment of individual-based population genetic statistical techniques: application to British pig breeds.

Authors:  S Wilkinson; C Haley; L Alderson; P Wiener
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genetic analysis and characterization of a new maize association mapping panel for quantitative trait loci dissection.

Authors:  Xiaohong Yang; Jianbing Yan; Trushar Shah; Marilyn L Warburton; Qing Li; Lin Li; Yufeng Gao; Yuchao Chai; Zhiyuan Fu; Yi Zhou; Shutu Xu; Guanghong Bai; Yijiang Meng; Yanping Zheng; Jiansheng Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units.

Authors:  W Chris Funk; John K McKay; Paul A Hohenlohe; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Inference and Analysis of Population Structure Using Genetic Data and Network Theory.

Authors:  Gili Greenbaum; Alan R Templeton; Shirli Bar-David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Speciation slowing down in widespread and long-living tree taxa: insights from the tropical timber tree genus Milicia (Moraceae).

Authors:  K Daïnou; G Mahy; J Duminil; C W Dick; J-L Doucet; A S L Donkpégan; M Pluijgers; B Sinsin; P Lejeune; O J Hardy
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Empirical Bayes inference of pairwise F(ST) and its distribution in the genome.

Authors:  Shuichi Kitada; Toshihide Kitakado; Hirohisa Kishino
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Spatio-temporal population structuring and genetic diversity retention in depleted Atlantic bluefin tuna of the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Giulia Riccioni; Monica Landi; Giorgia Ferrara; Ilaria Milano; Alessia Cariani; Lorenzo Zane; Massimo Sella; Guido Barbujani; Fausto Tinti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.