Literature DB >> 29651610

Periprosthetic femoral fracture as cause of early revision after short stem hip arthroplasty-a multicentric analysis.

Sang-Min Kim1, Seung-Beom Han2, Kee Hyung Rhyu3, Jeong Joon Yoo4, Kwang-Jun Oh5, Je Hyun Yoo6, Kyung-Jae Lee7, Seung-Jae Lim8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and causes of early re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems in a large multicentre series. Specifically, we evaluated the clinical features of periprosthetic fractures occurring around short stems.
METHODS: A total of 897 patients (1089 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty from January 2011 to February 2015 using short bone-preserving femoral stems were recruited. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range, 18-97 years), with a male ratio of 49.7% (541/1089). Re-operation for any reason within two years was used as an endpoint. The incidence and clinical characteristics of the periprosthetic femoral fractures were also recorded. Mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (range, 2-7.9 years).
RESULTS: Early re-operation for any reason was identified in 16 (1.5%) of 1089 hips. The main reason for re-operation was periprosthetic femoral fracture, which accounted for eight (50%) of the 16 re-operations. The overall incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture at two years was 1.1% (12/1089). According to the Vancouver classification, two fractures were AG type and the other ten were B1 type. Advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologist grade, femur morphology of Dorr type C, and the use of a calcar-loading stem increased the risk for periprosthetic femoral fracture.
CONCLUSION: Periprosthetic femoral fracture was the major reason for re-operation after hip replacement surgery using short bone-preserving stems accounting for 50% (8/16) of re-operations two years post-operatively, but did not seem to deteriorate survivorship of implanted prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip replacement; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Reoperation; Short stem

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29651610     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3930-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  39 in total

1.  Anatomic Porous Replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M Absatz; T A Gruen; M T Saberi; J F Doerzbacher
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-07

2.  A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection device.

Authors:  Joseph Daniel; Chandra Pradhan; Hena Ziaee; Derek J W McMinn
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older.

Authors:  Ronak M Patel; Matthew C Smith; Chase C Woodward; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  R M D Meek; T Norwood; R Smith; I J Brenkel; C R Howie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

6.  Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component.

Authors:  K Gromov; A Bersang; C S Nielsen; T Kallemose; H Husted; A Troelsen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Harpal S Khanuja; Samik Banerjee; Deepak Jain; Robert Pivec; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?

Authors:  Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification.

Authors:  Mohamed Daabiss
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03

10.  Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study.

Authors:  Christopher Jones; Adeel Aqil; Susannah Clarke; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-21
View more
  12 in total

1.  Outcomes of cerclage wiring to manage intra-operative femoral fracture occurring during cementless hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Nakarin Saiyudthong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Development of periprosthetic bone mass density around the cementless Metha® short hip stem during three year follow up-a prospective radiological and clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Augustin; Sarah Boller; Cathrein Bobach; Alexander Jahnke; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Nicola Santori; Francesco Falez; Domenico Potestio; Francesco Saverio Santori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Giorgia Caputo; Davide E Bonasia; Paolo Rossi; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Varus malalignment of short femoral stem not associated with post-hip arthroplasty fracture.

Authors:  Scott T Nishioka; Samantha N Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Does femoral stem choice influence fracture type or incidence for direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Dylan B Combs; Scott T Nishioka; Samantha N Andrews; Joseph Varcadipane; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.928

9.  Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Georgios Gkagkalis; Patrick Goetti; Sabine Mai; Ingmar Meinecke; Näder Helmy; Dominique Bosson; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Small Stems for Big Challenges.

Authors:  Phillip A Bostian; Brian T Grisez; Adam E Klein; Benjamin M Frye
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.