Dylan B Combs1, Scott T Nishioka1,2, Samantha N Andrews3,4, Joseph Varcadipane2, Cass K Nakasone2,5. 1. John A Burns School of Medicine, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA. 2. Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, 888 South King Street, Honolulu, HI, 96818, USA. 3. Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, 888 South King Street, Honolulu, HI, 96818, USA. samantha.andrews@straub.net. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Hawai'i, John A. Burns School of Medicine, 1356 Lusitana Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA. samantha.andrews@straub.net. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Hawai'i, John A. Burns School of Medicine, 1356 Lusitana Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite similar fracture rates, the incidence of intraoperative and post-operative fractures between standard (ST) length and short (SH) femoral stems remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative fractures between three ST and a single tapered-wedge SH femoral stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on 1113 patients (1306 hips) having undergone total hip arthroplasty, via the anterior approach on a fracture table, between 2014 and 2019. One surgeon completed all ST procedures (314 hips), using one of three implants without discretion. One surgeon completed all SH procedures (992 hips), using one implant design. Differences between ST and SH groups were evaluated by independent t tests (continuous variables) and Chi-square tests (categorical variables). RESULTS: Patients in the SH group were significantly older (p < 0.001) and had a lower body mass index (p = 0.001) compared to the ST group. The total number of fractures was 12 (3.8%) and 14 (1.4%) in the ST and SH groups, respectively. The 12 ST fractures occurred intraoperatively, compared to two (0.2%) in the SH group. The remaining seven (0.7%) SH fractures occurred post-operatively. There was no difference in fracture rate between the three ST designs (p = 0.882). Interestingly, five (0.5%) insufficiency fractures were diagnosed in the SH group. CONCLUSION: The risk of intraoperative and post-operative fractures following anterior total hip arthroplasty may be biased toward ST and SH implants, respectively. These results, along with the presence of five insufficient fractures, identify potential fracture risks and mechanisms for specific implant designs.
INTRODUCTION: Despite similar fracture rates, the incidence of intraoperative and post-operative fractures between standard (ST) length and short (SH) femoral stems remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative fractures between three ST and a single tapered-wedge SH femoral stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on 1113 patients (1306 hips) having undergone total hip arthroplasty, via the anterior approach on a fracture table, between 2014 and 2019. One surgeon completed all ST procedures (314 hips), using one of three implants without discretion. One surgeon completed all SH procedures (992 hips), using one implant design. Differences between ST and SH groups were evaluated by independent t tests (continuous variables) and Chi-square tests (categorical variables). RESULTS: Patients in the SH group were significantly older (p < 0.001) and had a lower body mass index (p = 0.001) compared to the ST group. The total number of fractures was 12 (3.8%) and 14 (1.4%) in the ST and SH groups, respectively. The 12 ST fractures occurred intraoperatively, compared to two (0.2%) in the SH group. The remaining seven (0.7%) SH fractures occurred post-operatively. There was no difference in fracture rate between the three ST designs (p = 0.882). Interestingly, five (0.5%) insufficiency fractures were diagnosed in the SH group. CONCLUSION: The risk of intraoperative and post-operative fractures following anterior total hip arthroplasty may be biased toward ST and SH implants, respectively. These results, along with the presence of five insufficient fractures, identify potential fracture risks and mechanisms for specific implant designs.
Authors: Phonthakorn Panichkul; Nancy L Parks; Henry Ho; Robert H Hopper; William G Hamilton Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Ryan G Molli; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.176