Literature DB >> 29648985

Feasibility of Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit.

Alexander Lilja-Cyron1, Jesper Kelsen2, Morten Andresen1, Kåre Fugleholm1, Marianne Juhler1.   

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is crucial in the management of acute neurosurgical conditions such as traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, pathological ICP may persist beyond the admission to the neuro intensive care unit (NICU). We investigated the feasibility of telemetric ICP monitoring in the NICU, as this technology provides the possibility of long-term ICP assessment beyond NICU discharge. In this prospective investigation, we implanted telemetric ICP sensors (Raumedic Neurovent-P-tel) instead of conventional, cabled ICP sensors in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. We recorded ICP curves, duration of ICP monitoring, signal quality, and complications. Seventeen patients were included (median age 55 years) and diagnoses were: severe TBI (8), malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (8), and spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (1). In total, 3015 h of ICP monitoring were performed, and the median duration of ICP monitoring was 188 h (interquartile range [IQR] 54-259). The ICP signal was lost 613 times (displacement of the reader unit on the skin) for a median of 1.5 min, corresponding to 0.8% of the total monitoring period. When the signal was lost, it could always be restored by realignment of the reader unit on the skin above the telemetric sensor. Sixteen of 17 patients survived the NICU admission, and ICP gradually decreased from 10.7 mm Hg (IQR 7.5-13.6) during the first postoperative day to 6.3 mm Hg (IQR 4.0-8.3) after 1 week in the NICU. All 17 implanted telemetric sensors functioned throughout the NICU admission, and no wound infections were observed. Therefore, telemetric ICP monitoring in an acute neurosurgical setting is feasible. Signal quality and stability are sufficient for clinical decision making based on mean ICP. The low sampling frequency (5 Hz) does not permit analysis of intracranial pulse wave morphology, but resolution is sufficient for calculation of derived indices such as the pressure reactivity index (PRx).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICP; TBI; decompressive craniectomy; telemetric; telemetry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29648985     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  8 in total

Review 1.  Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Omidbeigi; Monireh-Sadat Mousavi; Sogol Meknatkhah; Maryam Edalatfar; Ausaf Bari; Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in children.

Authors:  Sarah Hornshøj Pedersen; Nicolas Hernandez Norager; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Marianne Juhler
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Monitoring and Measurement of Intracranial Pressure in Pediatric Head Trauma.

Authors:  Sarah Hornshøj Pedersen; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Ramona Astrand; Marianne Juhler
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Benefits and obstacles of telemetric ICP monitoring.

Authors:  Joachim M K Oertel; Matthias J M Huelser
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Hernandez Norager; Markus Harboe Olsen; Sarah Hornshoej Pedersen; Casper Schwartz Riedel; Marek Czosnyka; Marianne Juhler
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-04-13

6.  k-Shape clustering for extracting macro-patterns in intracranial pressure signals.

Authors:  Isabel Martinez-Tejada; Casper Schwartz Riedel; Marianne Juhler; Morten Andresen; Jens E Wilhjelm
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-02-05

7.  Long-term monitoring of intracranial pressure in freely-moving rats; impact of different physiological states.

Authors:  Sajedeh Eftekhari; Connar Stanley James Westgate; Katrine Printz Johansen; Signe Rath Bruun; Rigmor H Jensen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 8.  Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-05-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.