Literature DB >> 32430803

Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Mahmoud Omidbeigi1, Monireh-Sadat Mousavi2, Sogol Meknatkhah2, Maryam Edalatfar3, Ausaf Bari1,4, Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini5.   

Abstract

Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a new method of measuring ICP which eliminates some of the shortcomings of previous methods. However, there are limited data on specific characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main aim of this study was to demonstrate the indications, benefits, and complications of telemetric ICP monitoring. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies without language or date restriction in May 2019. Human studies in which telemetric ICP monitoring was the main subject of the study were included. Our initial search resulted in 1650 articles from which 50 studies were included. There were no randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies were case reports or case series (68%). The most common aim of studies was testing of the device (52%), and monitoring the disease progression or recovery (46%). The most common indications for telemetric ICP monitoring in these studies were testing cerebrospinal fluid shunt function (46%), ICP control after the procedure (36%), and diagnosing intracranial hypertension (22%) and hydrocephalus (12%). In total, 1423 brain disease patients had been monitored in studies. The possibility of long-term ICP monitoring as the main benefit was reported in 38 (76%) studies. The associated complication rate was 7.1%. Despite the increasing application of telemetric monitoring devices, studies to evaluate specific characteristics of this method have been infrequent and inadequate. Future research using a higher level of scientific methods is needed to evaluate advantage and disadvantages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrospinal fluid pressure; Intracranial pressure; Physiologic monitoring; Telemetry

Year:  2021        PMID: 32430803     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00992-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  39 in total

1.  Reduction in external ventricular drain infection rate. Impact of a minimal handling protocol and antibiotic-impregnated catheters.

Authors:  Mónica Rivero-Garvía; Javier Márquez-Rivas; Manuel Enrique Jiménez-Mejías; Olaf Neth; Ana Belén Rueda-Torres
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  The role of ICP monitoring in meningitis.

Authors:  Areej Tariq; Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Ricardo A Hanel; Neeraj Naval; Mohamad Chmayssani
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 3.  Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Samon Tavakoli; Geoffrey Peitz; William Ares; Shaheryar Hafeez; Ramesh Grandhi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Telemetric ICP monitoring after surgery for posterior fossa and third ventricular tumors. Technical note.

Authors:  P H Chapman; E Cosman; M Arnold
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe blunt head trauma: does the type of monitoring device matter?

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Desmond Khor; Jayun Cho; Elizabeth Benjamin; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus: impact of shunt adjustments and body positions.

Authors:  Dan Farahmand; Sara Qvarlander; Jan Malm; Carsten Wikkelsö; Anders Eklund; Magnus Tisell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  N J Hopf; P Grunert; G Fries; K D Resch; A Perneczky
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  C Robba; S Bacigaluppi; D Cardim; J Donnelly; A Bertuccio; M Czosnyka
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.209

Review 10.  Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Martin Smith
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurosurgical CSF Diversion in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Geraint J Sunderland; Michael D Jenkinson; Elizabeth J Conroy; Carrol Gamble; Conor L Mallucci
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.