Literature DB >> 33849603

Reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure: a systematic review.

Nicolas Hernandez Norager1, Markus Harboe Olsen2, Sarah Hornshoej Pedersen3, Casper Schwartz Riedel3,4, Marek Czosnyka5, Marianne Juhler3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although widely used in the evaluation of the diseased, normal intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure remain sparsely documented. Intracranial pressure is different from lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. In addition, intracranial pressure differs considerably according to the body position of the patient. Despite this, the current reference values do not distinguish between intracranial and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressures, and body position-dependent reference values do not exist. In this study, we aim to establish these reference values.
METHOD: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Sciences. Methodological quality was assessed using an amended version of the Joanna Briggs Quality Appraisal Checklist. Intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were independently evaluated and subdivided into body positions. Quantitative data were presented with mean ± SD, and 90% reference intervals.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. Nine studies reported values for intracranial pressure, while 27 reported values for the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Reference values for intracranial pressure were -  5.9 to 8.3 mmHg in the upright position and 0.9 to 16.3 mmHg in the supine position. Reference values for lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were 7.2 to 16.8 mmHg and 5.7 to 15.5 mmHg in the lateral recumbent position and supine position, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review is the first to provide position-dependent reference values for intracranial pressure and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Clinically applicable reference values for normal lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure were established, and are in accordance with previously used reference values. For intracranial pressure, this study strongly emphasizes the scarcity of normal pressure measures, and highlights the need for further research on the matter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF; Cerebrospinal fluid pressure; ICP; Intracranial pressure; Reference intervals; Reference values

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849603     DOI: 10.1186/s12987-021-00253-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS        ISSN: 2045-8118


  54 in total

1.  CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion.

Authors:  J Ekstedt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Long-term monitoring of intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus and other CSF disorders.

Authors:  Zofia Czosnyka; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  O Gilland; W W Tourtellotte; L O'Tauma; W G Henderson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Reference values for CSF outflow resistance and intracranial pressure in healthy elderly.

Authors:  Jan Malm; Johan Jacobsson; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Lumbar catheter for monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with post-hemorrhagic communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Verena Speck; Dimitre Staykov; Hagen B Huttner; Roland Sauer; Stefan Schwab; Juergen Bardutzky
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in pediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus and tentative shunt failure: a single-center experience over 10 years in 146 patients.

Authors:  Terje Sæhle; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2 . Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow.

Authors:  J Ekstedt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Value of overnight monitoring of intracranial pressure in hydrocephalic children.

Authors:  Martin U Schuhmann; Sandeep Sood; James P McAllister; Matthias Jaeger; Steven D Ham; Zofia Czosnyka; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 1.162

9.  Feasibility of Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Jesper Kelsen; Morten Andresen; Kåre Fugleholm; Marianne Juhler
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  CSF opening pressure: reference interval and the effect of body mass index.

Authors:  W Whiteley; R Al-Shahi; C P Warlow; M Zeidler; C J Lueck
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  5 in total

1.  Noninvasive indicators of intracranial pressure before, during, and after long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Jessica V Jasien; Steven S Laurie; Stuart M C Lee; David S Martin; David T Kemp; Douglas J Ebert; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Karina Marshall-Goebel; Irina V Alferova; Ashot Sargsyan; Richard W Danielson; Alan R Hargens; Scott A Dulchavsky; Michael B Stenger; Brandon R Macias
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 2.  Cerebral Venous Outflow Implications in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension-From Physiopathology to Treatment.

Authors:  Sorin Tuță
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Advances in brain barriers and brain fluids research in 2021: great progress in a time of adversity.

Authors:  Richard F Keep; Hazel C Jones; Lester R Drewes
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Elevated CSF inflammatory markers in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus do not promote NKCC1 hyperactivity in rat choroid plexus.

Authors:  Sara Diana Lolansen; Nina Rostgaard; Søren Norge Andreassen; Anja Hviid Simonsen; Marianne Juhler; Steen Gregers Hasselbalch; Nanna MacAulay
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-12-04

5.  Automated Pupillometry as an Assessment Tool for Intracranial Hemodynamics in Septic Patients.

Authors:  Ilaria Alice Crippa; Paolo Pelosi; Armin Alvaro Quispe-Cornejo; Antonio Messina; Francesco Corradi; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Chiara Robba
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 7.666

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.