Literature DB >> 31309286

Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in children.

Sarah Hornshøj Pedersen1,2, Nicolas Hernandez Norager3, Alexander Lilja-Cyron3, Marianne Juhler3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Repeated intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements are essential in treatment of patients with complex cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders. These patients often have a long surgical history with numerous invasive lumbar or intracranial pressure monitoring sessions and/or ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt revisions. Telemetric ICP monitoring might be an advantageous tool in treatment of these patients. In this paper, we evaluate our experience with this technology in paediatric patients.
METHODS: During a 4-year period, we implanted telemetric ICP sensors (Raumedic NEUROVENT-P-tel) in 20 paediatric patients to minimise the number of future invasive procedures. Patients were diagnosed with hydrocephalus, idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) or an arachnoid cyst. Most patients (85%) had a VP shunt at the time of sensor implantation.
RESULTS: In total, 32 sensors were inserted in the 20 patients; the cause of re-implantation was technical malfunction of the implant. One sensor was explanted due to wound infection and one due to skin erosion. We experienced no complications directly related to the implantation/explantation procedures. A total of 149 recording sessions were conducted, including 68 home monitoring sessions. The median implantation period was 523 days with a median duration of clinical use at 202 days. The most likely consequence of a recording session was non-surgical treatment alteration (shunt valve adjustment or acetazolamide dose adjustment).
CONCLUSION: Telemetric ICP monitoring in children is safe and potentially decreases the number of invasive procedures. We find that telemetric ICP monitoring aids the clinical management of patients with complex CSF disorders and improves everyday life for both patient and parents. It allows continuous ICP measurement in the patient's home and thereby potentially reducing hospitalisations, leading to significant cost savings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; paediatric; Hydrocephalus; ICP; intracranial pressure; IIH; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Raumedic; Telemetric; telemetry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309286     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04271-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  23 in total

1.  Detection of hidden pseudotumour cerebri behind Chiari 1 malformation: value of telemetric ICP monitoring.

Authors:  Melanie Schmitt; Michael Kiefer; Sebastian Antes; Regina Eymann
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring with the Raumedic Neurovent P-tel.

Authors:  Sebastian Antes; Christoph A Tschan; Michael Heckelmann; David Breuskin; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Intracranial Pressure-Guided Shunt Valve Adjustments with the Miethke Sensor Reservoir.

Authors:  Sebastian Antes; Axel Stadie; Simon Müller; Stefan Linsler; David Breuskin; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Telemetric intra-cranial pressure monitoring: clinical and financial considerations.

Authors:  James M Barber; Catherine J Pringle; Helen Raffalli-Ebezant; Omar Pathmanaban; Roberto Ramirez; Ian D Kamaly-Asl
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Invasive and noninvasive means of measuring intracranial pressure: a review.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Joshua E Medow; Bermans J Iskandar; Fa Wang; Mehdi Shokoueinejad; Joyce Koueik; John G Webster
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Medication overuse as a cause of chronic headache in shunted hydrocephalus patients.

Authors:  L Willer; R H Jensen; M Juhler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Use of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Frequently Refutes Diagnosis of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  David S Xu; Randall J Hlubek; Celene B Mulholland; Kerry L Knievel; Kris A Smith; Peter Nakaji
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Design challenges of implantable pressure monitoring system.

Authors:  Guangqiang Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Clinical and radiological findings in long-term intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Sebastian Antes; Christoph A Tschan; Gerd Kunze; Lara Ewert; Anna Zimmer; Alexander Halfmann; Joachim Oertel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  Chronically implanted pressure sensors: challenges and state of the field.

Authors:  Lawrence Yu; Brian J Kim; Ellis Meng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term monitoring of intracranial pressure in freely-moving rats; impact of different physiological states.

Authors:  Sajedeh Eftekhari; Connar Stanley James Westgate; Katrine Printz Johansen; Signe Rath Bruun; Rigmor H Jensen
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-09

2.  Intraoperative Measurement of Intracranial Pressure During Cranial Vault Remodeling in Children with Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Subhas Konar; Dhaval Shukla; Dwarakanath Srinivas; Vishram Pandey; Mini Jayan; Nishanth Sadashiva; Bhagavatula Indira Devi
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2022-01-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.