Literature DB >> 24969672

FLS skill acquisition: a comparison of blocked vs interleaved practice.

Steven B Goldin1, Gregory T Horn1, Michael J Schnaus2, Mark Grichanik3, Adam J Ducey3, Charles Nofsinger1, David J Hernandez4, Murray L Shames1, Raman P Singh1, Michael T Brannick5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification is required for general surgery. The recommended practice for learning FLS is to practice tasks one at a time until proficient (blocked practice). Learning theory suggests that interleaved practice, a method in which tasks are rotated rather than learned one at a time, may result in superior learning.
METHOD: Residents were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: blocked practice or interleaved practice. We compared the performance of residents across groups over 20 trials of each of 4 FLS tasks (peg transfer, pattern cut, extracorporeal suture, and intracorporeal suture). Four weeks later, participants returned to the laboratory and completed 2 additional trials of each of the 4 tasks.
RESULTS: Performance on each of the tasks improved with increased practice. The interleaved group showed significantly better performance on the peg transfer task; trends favoring the interleaved group resulted for the other tasks. Standardized mean differences in favor of the interleaved group were substantial both at the end of practice and at follow-up (with the exception of the pattern cut).
CONCLUSION: Interleaved practice appears to have advantages over blocked practice in developing and retaining FLS skills. We encourage others to experiment with the method to confirm our findings.
Copyright © 2014 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FLS; Medical Knowledge; Patient Care; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; practice; proficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969672     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  5 in total

1.  Impact of one-to-one tutoring on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) passing rate in a single center experience outside the United States: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Federico Gheza; Paolo Raimondi; Leonardo Solaini; Federico Coccolini; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Nazario Portolani; Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of continuous training through distributed practice for acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills.

Authors:  Bruce Negrello Nakata; Worens Cavalini; Eduardo A Bonin; Paolo R Salvalaggio; Marcelo P Loureiro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Sleep and Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Authors:  Christel Gudberg; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation on laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition.

Authors:  P Ciechanski; A Cheng; O Damji; S Lopushinsky; K Hecker; Z Jadavji; A Kirton
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-03-13

Review 5.  Transfer: A Review for Biology and the Life Sciences.

Authors:  Althea N Kaminske; Carolina E Kuepper-Tetzel; Cynthia L Nebel; Megan A Sumeracki; Sean P Ryan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.