Literature DB >> 29627950

Molecular-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection is associated with reduced mortality.

Tomer Avni1,2, Tanya Babich3,4, Haim Ben-Zvi3,5, Alaa Atamna3,6, Dafna Yahav7,3, Daniel Shepshelovich3,4, Yaara Leibovici-Weissman3,8, Jihad Bishara7,3.   

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) might result in overdiagnosis. The clinical outcomes of symptomatic CDI patients diagnosed by PCR remain uncertain. We aimed to determine whether patients whose diagnosis of CDI was based on PCR had different characteristics and clinical outcomes than those diagnosed by toxin immunoassay. Consecutive CDI patients, hospitalized at Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel, between January 2013 and January 2016, were identified retrospectively and included in the study. Diagnosis of CDI was based on PCR or diagnosis by immunoassay for C. difficile toxin. The main outcome was 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality. The PCR group included 165 patients and the immunoassay group included 157 patients. In comparison to the immunoassay group, patients in the PCR group were more likely to be younger, to be independent, to undergo previous abdominal surgery, and to use laxatives. The 30-day mortality rate in the PCR group was significantly lower than that in the immunoassay group, 29/165 (18%) vs 49/157 (31%), respectively; p = 0.028. On multivariate analysis, PCR diagnosis was associated with reduced mortality, OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.26-0.88). PCR-based diagnosis of CDI is associated with reduced all-cause mortality rates. Further studies are needed to determine the management of patients with discrepant immunoassay and PCR diagnosis of CDI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Diarrhea; Immunoassay; Mortality; PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627950     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3228-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Jonathan Swindells; Nigel Brenwald; Nathan Reading; Beryl Oppenheim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical and infection control implications of Clostridium difficile infection with negative enzyme immunoassay for toxin.

Authors:  Dubert M Guerrero; Christina Chou; Lucy A Jury; Michelle M Nerandzic; Jennifer C Cadnum; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Changes in the incidence of health care-associated pathogens at a university hospital from 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  JaHyun Kang; Emily E Sickbert-Bennett; Vickie M Brown; David J Weber; William A Rutala
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 4.  Nosocomial diarrhea: evaluation and treatment of causes other than Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Sylvie Trottier; Gilles Brochu; Bianka Paquet-Bolduc; Christophe Garenc; Vilayvong Loungnarath; Catherine Beaulieu; Danielle Goulet; Jean Longtin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with discordant diagnostic test results.

Authors:  Anna Kaltsas; Matt Simon; Larissa H Unruh; Crystal Son; Danielle Wroblewski; Kimberlee A Musser; Kent Sepkowitz; N Esther Babady; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Clare E Gyorke; Michael A Kennedy; Jhansi L Leslie; David L Chin; Susan Wang; Hien H Nguyen; Bin Huang; Yi-Wei Tang; Lenora W Lee; Kyoungmi Kim; Sandra Taylor; Patrick S Romano; Edward A Panacek; Parker B Goodell; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection.

Authors:  Timothy D Planche; Kerrie A Davies; Pietro G Coen; John M Finney; Irene M Monahan; Kirsti A Morris; Lily O'Connor; Sarah J Oakley; Cassie F Pope; Mike W Wren; Nandini P Shetty; Derrick W Crook; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Increase in adult Clostridium difficile-related hospitalizations and case-fatality rate, United States, 2000-2005.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Andrew F Shorr; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  The Role of Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GDH) Testing Assay in the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infections: A High Sensitive Screening Test and an Essential Step in the Proposed Laboratory Diagnosis Workflow for Developing Countries like China.

Authors:  Jing-Wei Cheng; Meng Xiao; Timothy Kudinha; Zhi-Peng Xu; Lin-Ying Sun; Xin Hou; Li Zhang; Xin Fan; Fanrong Kong; Ying-Chun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinical heterogeneity of patients with stool samples testing PCR+/Tox- from a two-step Clostridium difficile diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Jason Zou; Victor Leung; Sylvie Champagne; Michelle Hinch; Anna Wong; Elisa Lloyd-Smith; Trong Tien Nguyen; Marc G Romney; Azra Sharma; Michael Payne; Christopher F Lowe
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.

Authors:  Megan D Shah; Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat; Kelci Coe; Erica Reed; Johanna Sandlund; Preeti Pancholi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.

Authors:  Alice Y Guh; Kelly M Hatfield; Lisa G Winston; Brittany Martin; Helen Johnston; Geoffrey Brousseau; Monica M Farley; Lucy Wilson; Rebecca Perlmutter; Erin C Phipps; Ghinwa K Dumyati; Deborah Nelson; Trupti Hatwar; Marion A Kainer; Ashley L Paulick; Maria Karlsson; Dale N Gerding; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Impact of the Introduction of a Two-Step Laboratory Diagnostic Algorithm in the Incidence and Earlier Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Nieves Sopena; Jun Hao Wang-Wang; Irma Casas; Lourdes Mateu; Laia Castellà; María José García-Quesada; Sara Gutierrez; Josep M Llibre; M Luisa Pedro-Botet; Gema Fernandez-Rivas
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Predictors of Clostridioides difficile Infection-Related Complications and Treatment Patterns among Nucleic Acid Amplification Test-Positive/Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay-Negative Patients.

Authors:  Ryan Miller; J A Morillas; Kyle D Brizendine; Thomas G Fraser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The Role of Diagnostic Stewardship in Clostridioides difficile Testing: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Frances J Boly; Kimberly A Reske; Jennie H Kwon
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.725

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.