Young Woo Park1, Dinesh K Deelchand2, James M Joers2, Brian Hanna2, Adam Berrington3, Joseph S Gillen3, Kejal Kantarci4, Brian J Soher5, Peter B Barker3, HyunWook Park1, Gülin Öz2, Christophe Lenglet2. 1. School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a fast and automated volume-of-interest (VOI) prescription pipeline (AutoVOI) for single-voxel MRS that removes the need for manual VOI placement, allows flexible VOI planning in any brain region, and enables high inter- and intra-subject consistency of VOI prescription. METHODS: AutoVOI was designed to transfer pre-defined VOIs from an atlas to the 3D anatomical data of the subject during the scan. The AutoVOI pipeline was optimized for consistency in VOI placement (precision), enhanced coverage of the targeted tissue (accuracy), and fast computation speed. The tool was evaluated against manual VOI placement using existing T1 -weighted data sets and corresponding VOI prescriptions. Finally, it was implemented on 2 scanner platforms to acquire MRS data from clinically relevant VOIs that span the cerebrum, cerebellum, and the brainstem. RESULTS: The AutoVOI pipeline includes skull stripping, non-linear registration of the atlas to the subject's brain, and computation of the VOI coordinates and angulations using a minimum oriented bounding box algorithm. When compared against manual prescription, AutoVOI showed higher intra- and inter-subject spatial consistency, as quantified by generalized Dice coefficients (GDC), lower intra- and inter-subject variability in tissue composition (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) and higher or equal accuracy, as quantified by GDC of prescribed VOI with targeted tissues. High quality spectra were obtained on Siemens and Philips 3T systems from 6 automatically prescribed VOIs by the tool. CONCLUSION: Robust automatic VOI prescription is feasible and can help facilitate clinical adoption of MRS by avoiding operator dependence of manual selection.
PURPOSE: To develop a fast and automated volume-of-interest (VOI) prescription pipeline (AutoVOI) for single-voxel MRS that removes the need for manual VOI placement, allows flexible VOI planning in any brain region, and enables high inter- and intra-subject consistency of VOI prescription. METHODS: AutoVOI was designed to transfer pre-defined VOIs from an atlas to the 3D anatomical data of the subject during the scan. The AutoVOI pipeline was optimized for consistency in VOI placement (precision), enhanced coverage of the targeted tissue (accuracy), and fast computation speed. The tool was evaluated against manual VOI placement using existing T1 -weighted data sets and corresponding VOI prescriptions. Finally, it was implemented on 2 scanner platforms to acquire MRS data from clinically relevant VOIs that span the cerebrum, cerebellum, and the brainstem. RESULTS: The AutoVOI pipeline includes skull stripping, non-linear registration of the atlas to the subject's brain, and computation of the VOI coordinates and angulations using a minimum oriented bounding box algorithm. When compared against manual prescription, AutoVOI showed higher intra- and inter-subject spatial consistency, as quantified by generalized Dice coefficients (GDC), lower intra- and inter-subject variability in tissue composition (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) and higher or equal accuracy, as quantified by GDC of prescribed VOI with targeted tissues. High quality spectra were obtained on Siemens and Philips 3T systems from 6 automatically prescribed VOIs by the tool. CONCLUSION: Robust automatic VOI prescription is feasible and can help facilitate clinical adoption of MRS by avoiding operator dependence of manual selection.
Authors: Simon F Eskildsen; Pierrick Coupé; Vladimir Fonov; José V Manjón; Kelvin K Leung; Nicolas Guizard; Shafik N Wassef; Lasse Riis Østergaard; D Louis Collins Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Petr Bednařík; Amir Moheet; Dinesh K Deelchand; Uzay E Emir; Lynn E Eberly; Martin Bareš; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Gülin Öz Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Weiqiang Dou; Oliver Speck; Thomas Benner; Jörn Kaufmann; Meng Li; Kai Zhong; Martin Walter Journal: MAGMA Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Burcu Zeydan; Dinesh K Deelchand; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Timothy G Lesnick; Orhun H Kantarci; Mary M Machulda; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Gülin Öz; Kejal Kantarci Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Vladimir Fonov; Alan C Evans; Kelly Botteron; C Robert Almli; Robert C McKinstry; D Louis Collins Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gülin Öz; Dinesh K Deelchand; Jannie P Wijnen; Vladimír Mlynárik; Lijing Xin; Ralf Mekle; Ralph Noeske; Tom W J Scheenen; Ivan Tkáč Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Firat Kara; James M Joers; Dinesh K Deelchand; Young Woo Park; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Matthew L Senjem; Burcu Zeydan; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Gülin Öz; Kejal Kantarci Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Patrick J Bolan; Francesca Branzoli; Anna Luisa Di Stefano; Lucia Nichelli; Romain Valabregue; Sara L Saunders; Mehmet Akçakaya; Marc Sanson; Stéphane Lehéricy; Małgorzata Marjańska Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2020-09-29
Authors: Dinesh K Deelchand; Pierre-Gilles Henry; James M Joers; Edward J Auerbach; Young Woo Park; Firat Kara; Eva-Maria Ratai; Kejal Kantarci; Gülin Öz Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Michal Považan; Mark Mikkelsen; Adam Berrington; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Maiken K Brix; Pieter F Buur; Kim M Cecil; Kimberly L Chan; David Y T Chen; Alexander R Craven; Koen Cuypers; Michael Dacko; Niall W Duncan; Ulrike Dydak; David A Edmondson; Gabriele Ende; Lars Ersland; Megan A Forbes; Fei Gao; Ian Greenhouse; Ashley D Harris; Naying He; Stefanie Heba; Nigel Hoggard; Tun-Wei Hsu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Alayar Kangarlu; Thomas Lange; R Marc Lebel; Yan Li; Chien-Yuan E Lin; Jy-Kang Liou; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Feng Liu; Joanna R Long; Ruoyun Ma; Celine Maes; Marta Moreno-Ortega; Scott O Murray; Sean Noah; Ralph Noeske; Michael D Noseworthy; Georg Oeltzschner; Eric C Porges; James J Prisciandaro; Nicolaas A J Puts; Timothy P L Roberts; Markus Sack; Napapon Sailasuta; Muhammad G Saleh; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Nicholas Simard; Diederick Stoffers; Stephan P Swinnen; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Truong; Guangbin Wang; Iain D Wilkinson; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Adam J Woods; Hongmin Xu; Fuhua Yan; Chencheng Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Helge J Zöllner; Richard A E Edden; Peter B Barker Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Dinesh K Deelchand; Adam Berrington; Ralph Noeske; James M Joers; Arvin Arani; Joseph Gillen; Michael Schär; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Scott Peltier; Navid Seraji-Bozorgzad; Karl Landheer; Christoph Juchem; Brian J Soher; Douglas C Noll; Kejal Kantarci; Eva M Ratai; Thomas H Mareci; Peter B Barker; Gülin Öz Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: In-Young Choi; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter Barker; Wolfgang Bogner; Richard A E Edden; Lana G Kaiser; Phil Lee; Małgorzata Marjańska; Melissa Terpstra; Robin A de Graaf Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Malte Hoffmann; Esra Abaci Turk; Borjan Gagoski; Leah Morgan; Paul Wighton; M Dylan Tisdall; Martin Reuter; Elfar Adalsteinsson; P Ellen Grant; Lawrence L Wald; André J W van der Kouwe Journal: Int J Imaging Syst Technol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Pratik Talati; Mohamed El-Abtah; Daniel Kim; Jorg Dietrich; Melanie Fu; Michael Wenke; Julian He; Sharif N Natheir; Mark Vangel; Otto Rapalino; Anna Vaynrub; Isabel Arrillaga-Romany; Deborah A Forst; Yi-Fen Yen; Ovidiu Andronesi; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Bruce Rosen; Tracy T Batchelor; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Eva-Maria Ratai Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2021-04-15