Literature DB >> 29623732

Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.

Daniel Pilger1, David Homburg1, Tobias Brockmann1, Necip Torun1, Eckart Bertelmann1, Christoph von Sonnleithner1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcome after a bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens in comparison to a monofocal intraocular lens.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Charité-Medical University Berlin, Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 eyes of 30 patients were enrolled in this prospective, single-center study. The cataract patients underwent phacoemulsification with bilateral implantation of a TECNIS® Symfony (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA, USA, 15 patients) or a TECNIS Monofocal ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA, USA, 15 patients). Postoperative evaluations were performed after 1 and 3 months, including visual acuities at far, intermediate, and near distance. Mesopic, scotopic vision, and contrast sensitivity were investigated. Aberrometry was performed using an iTrace aberrometer with a pupil scan size of 5.0 mm.
RESULTS: After 3 months, the TECNIS Symfony group reached an uncorrected visual acuity at far distance of -0.02 logMAR compared to -0.06 logMAR in the TECNIS Monofocal group ( p = 0.03). Regarding the uncorrected vision at intermediate and near distance the following values were obtained: intermediate visual acuity -0.13 versus 0.0 logMAR (TECNIS Symfony vs TECNIS Monofocal, p = 0.001) and near visual acuity 0.11 versus 0.26 logMAR (TECNIS Symfony vs TECNIS Monofocal, p = 0.001). Low-contrast visual acuities were 0.27 versus 0.20 logMar (TECNIS Symfony vs TECNIS Monofocal, p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: The TECNIS Symfony intraocular lens can be considered an appropriate alternative to multifocal intraocular lenses because of good visual results at far, intermediate, and near distance as well as in low-contrast vision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cataract; extended depth of focus; higher order aberration; intraocular lens

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29623732     DOI: 10.1177/1120672118766809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  11 in total

1.  Visual Performance after a Unilateral or Bilateral Implantation of Enlarged Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Cataract: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Se Hyun Choi; Hyo Kyung Lee; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 2.  AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Arindam Dey; Shovan Bhattacharrya; Amit Bahulayan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

3.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics.

Authors:  André Lins de Medeiros; Flavio Jones Saraiva; Camila Ishii Iguma; Danilo Varela Kniggendorf; Guilherme Alves; Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Cesar Vilar; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Celso Takashi Nakano; Walton Nosé; Wilson Takashi Hida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-29

4.  Optical aberrations in three different intraocular lens designs of a same platform.

Authors:  Francisco D A Bartol-Puyal; Galadriel Giménez; Irene Altemir; José M Larrosa; Vicente Polo; Luis Pablo
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  Monocular Clinical Outcomes and Range of Near Vision following Cataract Surgery with Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Rahul T Pandit
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Xiaohui Song; Wei Wang; Yanan Zhu; Danni Lyu; Xingchao Shentu; Peiqing Chen; Yibo Yu; Ke Yao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Straylight in Different Types of Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Augusto Arias; Harilaos Ginis; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial.

Authors:  Thomas Reinhard; Philip Maier; Daniel Böhringer; Eckart Bertelmann; Tobias Brockmann; Laszlo Kiraly; David Salom; Matteo Piovella; Stephane Colonval; Javier Mendicute
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison Between an Intraocular Lens With Extended Depth of Focus (Tecnis Symfony ZXR00) and a New Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Enhanced Intermediate Vision (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00).

Authors:  Young Joon Jeon; Yisang Yoon; Tae-Im Kim; Kyungmin Koh
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2021-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.