Literature DB >> 29623378

ACL graft compression: a method to allow reduced tunnel sizes in ACL reconstruction.

Breck R Lord1,2, Henry B Colaco3, Chinmay M Gupte4, Adrian J Wilson2, Andrew A Amis5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A common problem during ACL reconstruction is asymmetry of proximal-distal graft diameter leading to tunnel upsizing and graft-tunnel mismatch. Compression downsizing provides a graft of uniform size, allowing easy passage into a smaller tunnel. The purpose of this study was to quantify the graft compression technique and its effects on graft biomechanics and stability. It was hypothesised that compression downsizing would significantly reduce cross-sectional area (CSA); that no significant changes in graft biomechanics would occur; graft fixation stability would be improved.
METHOD: Sixty-eight non-irradiated peroneus longus (PL) tendons were investigated. Twenty were halved and paired into ten four-strand grafts, 20 strands were compressed by 0.5-1 mm diameter and changes in CSA recorded using an alginate mould technique. The following properties were compared with 20 control strands: cyclic strain when loaded 70-220 N for 1000 cycles; stiffness; ultimate tensile load and stress; Young's modulus. 24 PL tendons were quadrupled into grafts, 12 were compressed and all 24 were submerged in Ringer's solution at 37 °C and the CSA recorded over 12 h. Twelve compressed and 12 control quadrupled grafts were mounted in porcine femurs, placed in Ringer's solution for 12 h at 37 °C and graft displacement at the bone tunnel aperture recorded under cyclic loading.
RESULTS: Mean decreases in CSA of 31% under a stress of 471 kPa and 21% under a stress of 447 kPa were observed for doubled and quadrupled grafts, respectively. Compressed grafts re-expanded by 19% over 12 h compared to 2% for controls. No significant differences were observed between compressed and control grafts in the biomechanical properties and graft stability; mean cyclic displacements were 0.3 mm for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No detrimental biomechanical effects of graft compression on allograft PL tendons were observed. Following compression, the grafts significantly increased in size during in vitro joint simulation. No significant difference was observed in graft stability between groups. Graft compression did not cause adverse mechanical effects in vitro. Smaller tunnels for compressed grafts reduce bone loss and ease anatomical placement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Compression downsizing; Tendon graft biomechanics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29623378     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4932-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  T W Wilson; M P Zafuta; M Zobitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Robert S Wolf; Lawrence J Lemak
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  2002

3.  Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Sheen-Woo Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Won Seok Oh; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Sang Hak Lee; Jae Chul Yoo; Hae Chan Ha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Femoral bridge stability in double-bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of bridge width and different fixation techniques on the structural properties of the graft/femur complex.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Lehmann; Nani Osada; Thore Zantop; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Fifteen-Year Survival of Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 18 Years and Younger.

Authors:  Matthew D Morgan; Lucy J Salmon; Alison Waller; Justin P Roe; Leo A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Allograft Tendons for Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeremiah E Palmer; Joseph P Russell; Jason Grieshober; Abigail Iacangelo; Benjamin A Ellison; T Dylan Lease; Hyunchul Kim; R Frank Henn; Adam H Hsieh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Childhood soccer injuries treated in U.S. emergency departments.

Authors:  Annette L Adams; Melissa A Schiff
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Volker Musahl; Mohit Bhandari; Max Petzold; Freddie H Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reduction in Diameter of Hamstring Autograft With Additional Circumferential Preconditioning During ACL Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Daniel Weltsch; Calvin Chan; Kevin M Dale; Ryan J Koehler; Divya Talwar; Theodore J Ganley; J Todd R Lawrence
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.