Literature DB >> 19357859

Femoral bridge stability in double-bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of bridge width and different fixation techniques on the structural properties of the graft/femur complex.

Ann-Kristin Lehmann1, Nani Osada, Thore Zantop, Michael J Raschke, Wolf Petersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different widths of the bony bridge between the femoral AM and PL bundle tunnel and different fixation techniques on the structural properties of the graft/femur complex in double-bundle ACL reconstructions. HYPOTHESIS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a bony bridge between AM and PL bundle tunnel of 1 mm results in significantly lower structural properties of the graft/femur complex when compared to a bridge of 2 and 3 mm. Interference screw fixation significantly lowers the structural properties when compared to cortical fixation. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Double-bundle ACL reconstructions using different bridge widths (1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm bridge) were loaded to failure after a cyclic loading protocol (1,000 cycles 0-200 N) and the structural properties were compared to a single-bundle ACL reconstruction group (n = 10 in each group). The structural properties of using a cortical button fixation were then compared to interference screw fixation (2 mm bridge). Statistical analyses were performed using a Mann-Whitney test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Double-bundle reconstructions with cortical button fixation (1, 2, and 3 mm bridge) showed significantly higher ultimate failure loads and stiffness and significantly lower elongation compared to single-bundle reconstructions. Double-bundle ACL reconstructions with a 1 mm bridge showed significantly reduced structural properties of the graft/femur complex compared to a 2 or 3 mm bridge. Aperture fixation led to significantly lower ultimate loads when compared to cortical fixation.
CONCLUSION: The bony bridge between the two femoral tunnels in double-bundle ACL reconstructions influences the stability of the graft/femur complex. Aperture fixation using interference screws shows inferior results when compared to cortical fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results suggest that the indication for anatomical ACL reconstruction may include the size of the lateral femoral condyle. In small knees, a second femoral tunnel may be difficult to locate with a minimum bridge width of 2 mm.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19357859     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0869-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  15 in total

1.  A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: some concerns.

Authors:  Sanjay Meena; Vijay Kumar Digge; Hira Lal Nag; Samarth Mittal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Biomechanical properties of femoral posterior cruciate ligament fixations.

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri; K T Haag; S Brand; A Dratzidis; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Mechanical assessment of two different methods of tripling hamstring tendons when using suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Martyn Snow; William Cheung; Jamaluddin Mahmud; Sam Evans; Catherine Holt; Bin Wang; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.

Authors:  Cathrine Aga; Jüri-Tomas Kartus; Martin Lind; Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Lars-Petter Granan; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  ACL graft compression: a method to allow reduced tunnel sizes in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Breck R Lord; Henry B Colaco; Chinmay M Gupte; Adrian J Wilson; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Implant-free tibial fixations of the posterior cruciate ligament. Development and biomechanical testing].

Authors:  T Wehrhahn; M Ettinger; M Petri; E Liodakis; C Hurschler; U-V Albrecht; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: how big is the learning curve?

Authors:  Martyn Snow; William D Stanish
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Wehrhahn; M Petri; E Liodakis; G Olender; U-V Albrecht; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Interference screws are more likely to perform better than cortical button and cross-pin fixation for hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Yan; Jiao Jiao Li; Yuanyuan Zhu; Haifeng Liu; Ruxing Liu; Bin Zhao; Bin Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Patient Height may Predict the Length of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Ludwig Andribert Powantia Pontoh; Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim; Jessica Fiolin
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.