Literature DB >> 22249205

Analysis of tunnel widening after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Yong Seuk Lee1, Sheen-Woo Lee, Shin Woo Nam, Won Seok Oh, Jae Ang Sim, Ji Hoon Kwak, Beom Koo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tunnel widening using a multi-planar reformation of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in the orientation of the tunnel. The hypotheses of this study were as follows: (1) tunnel widening would be reduced with the above-mentioned technique, (2) the degree of tunnel widening would be different at the site of the tunnels, and (3) the time interval from surgery to MRI acquisition would affect the magnitude of tunnel widening.
METHODS: Forty double-bundle ACL reconstructed patients who underwent postoperative MRI were enrolled in this study. The postoperative MRI was performed at 26.7 ± 7.4 months in terms of time. The tunnel widening was examined using a multi-planar reformation of MRI in the orientation of the tunnel. Site-specific analysis was performed according to the depth (the entrance, mid, and exit portion) and wall (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral walls). The correlation between MRI and widening was also evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean tunnel widening of the femoral AM (Anteromedial), femoral PL (Posterolateral), tibial AM, and tibial PL in terms of the most widened diameter was 1.9 (25.4), 2.1 (30.8), 2.5 (32.8), and 3.2 mm (44.5%), respectively. The tibial PL tunnel showed significant widening than the other tunnels. At the entrance, tunnel widening occurred mostly, followed by the order of the mid and exit portion. Correlation analysis of the time interval of MRI acquisition and tunnel widening showed little association.
CONCLUSIONS: Tunnel widening after a double-bundle ACL reconstruction using an outside-in technique with press-fitting of the graft was acceptable compared to previously published studies. The tibial PL tunnel showed the most widening among the 4 tunnels examined with the tunnel entrance being most widened area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22249205     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1874-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation.

Authors:  J-U Buelow; R Siebold; A Ellermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effect of femoral tunnel length on the safety of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation using cross-pin technique: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Pablo Eduardo Gelber; Francisco Reina; Raúl Torres; Juan Carlos Monllau
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Brian Forsythe; Andrew K Wong; Scott Tashman; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Three-tesla MR imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 5.  MR imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Theodore T Miller
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study.

Authors:  Michael E Hantes; Athanasios K Liantsis; Georgios K Basdekis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Pascal Christel; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Iosif Gavriilidis; Efstathios K Motsis; Emilios E Pakos; Anastasios D Georgoulis; Gregory Mitsionis; Theodore A Xenakis
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark E Steiner; Todd C Battaglia; James F Heming; Jason D Rand; Anthony Festa; Michael Baria
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Jun Sic Park; Yong Seuk Lee; Young Jin Cho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral tunnel widening between outside-in and trans-tibial double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Beom Koo Lee; Won Seok Oh; Yong Kyun Cho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of anatomic ACL reconstruction between selective bundle reconstruction and double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Jae Ang Sim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Changhun Han; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The attic of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes of two suspensory femoral fixation systems.

Authors:  Ahmet Firat; Faruk Catma; Birol Tunc; Ciğdem Hacihafizoglu; Murat Altay; Murat Bozkurt; Mehmet Ismail S Kapicioglu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Morphological changes in femoral tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuta Tachibana; Tatsuo Mae; Konsei Shino; Takashi Kanamoto; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Outside-in Technique: Two- to Six-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-up.

Authors:  Jae Ang Sim; Yong Seuk Lee; Kyung Ok Kim; Jong Keun Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-02

7.  ACL graft compression: a method to allow reduced tunnel sizes in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Breck R Lord; Henry B Colaco; Chinmay M Gupte; Adrian J Wilson; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The remnant preservation technique reduces the amount of bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Shinya Yanagisawa; Masashi Kimura; Keiichi Hagiwara; Atsuko Ogoshi; Tomoyuki Nakagawa; Hiroyuki Shiozawa; Takashi Ohsawa; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Correlation between femoral guidewire position and tunnel communication in double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Lee; Jun Young Choi; Dong Hee Kim; Bun Jung Kang; Dae Cheol Nam; Hong Kwon Yoon; Sun Chul Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Diameter and Bioabsorbable Screw Findings After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction in 5-Year Clinical and MRI Follow-up.

Authors:  Tommi Kiekara; Antti Paakkala; Piia Suomalainen; Heini Huhtala; Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.