W Ray Kim1, Ajitha Mannalithara2, Julie K Heimbach3, Patrick S Kamath3, Sumeet K Asrani4, Scott W Biggins5, Nicholas L Wood6, Sommer E Gentry6, Allison J Kwong2. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: wrkim@stanford.edu. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 5. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 6. Department of Mathematics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been established as a reliable indicator of short-term survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. The current version (MELDNa), consisting of the international normalized ratio and serum bilirubin, creatinine, and sodium, has been used to determine organ allocation priorities for liver transplantation in the United States. The objective was to optimize MELD further by taking into account additional variables and updating coefficients with contemporary data. METHODS: All candidates registered on the liver transplant wait list in the US national registry from January 2016 through December 2018 were included. Uni- and multivariable Cox models were developed to predict survival up to 90 days after wait list registration. Model fit was tested using the concordance statistic (C-statistic) and reclassification, and the Liver Simulated Allocation Model was used to estimate the impact of replacing MELDNa with the new model. RESULTS: The final multivariable model was characterized by (1) additional variables of female sex and serum albumin, (2) interactions between bilirubin and sodium and between albumin and creatinine, and (3) an upper bound for creatinine at 3.0 mg/dL. The final model (MELD 3.0) had better discrimination than MELDNa (C-statistic, 0.869 vs 0.862; P < .01). Importantly, MELD 3.0 correctly reclassified a net of 8.8% of decedents to a higher MELD tier, affording them a meaningfully higher chance of transplantation, particularly in women. In the Liver Simulated Allocation Model analysis, MELD 3.0 resulted in fewer wait list deaths compared to MELDNa (7788 vs 7850; P = .02). CONCLUSION: MELD 3.0 affords more accurate mortality prediction in general than MELDNa and addresses determinants of wait list outcomes, including the sex disparity.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been established as a reliable indicator of short-term survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. The current version (MELDNa), consisting of the international normalized ratio and serum bilirubin, creatinine, and sodium, has been used to determine organ allocation priorities for liver transplantation in the United States. The objective was to optimize MELD further by taking into account additional variables and updating coefficients with contemporary data. METHODS: All candidates registered on the liver transplant wait list in the US national registry from January 2016 through December 2018 were included. Uni- and multivariable Cox models were developed to predict survival up to 90 days after wait list registration. Model fit was tested using the concordance statistic (C-statistic) and reclassification, and the Liver Simulated Allocation Model was used to estimate the impact of replacing MELDNa with the new model. RESULTS: The final multivariable model was characterized by (1) additional variables of female sex and serum albumin, (2) interactions between bilirubin and sodium and between albumin and creatinine, and (3) an upper bound for creatinine at 3.0 mg/dL. The final model (MELD 3.0) had better discrimination than MELDNa (C-statistic, 0.869 vs 0.862; P < .01). Importantly, MELD 3.0 correctly reclassified a net of 8.8% of decedents to a higher MELD tier, affording them a meaningfully higher chance of transplantation, particularly in women. In the Liver Simulated Allocation Model analysis, MELD 3.0 resulted in fewer wait list deaths compared to MELDNa (7788 vs 7850; P = .02). CONCLUSION: MELD 3.0 affords more accurate mortality prediction in general than MELDNa and addresses determinants of wait list outcomes, including the sex disparity.
Authors: Alina M Allen; Julie K Heimbach; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; W Ray Kim; Patrick S Kamath; Terry M Therneau Journal: Transplantation Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jasmohan S Bajaj; Puneeta Tandon; Jacqueline G OʼLeary; Scott W Biggins; Florence Wong; Patrick S Kamath; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Benedict Maliakkal; Jennifer C Lai; Michael Fallon; Paul Thuluvath; Hugo E Vargas; Ram M Subramanian; Leroy R Thacker; Rajender K Reddy Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Elizabeth L Godfrey; Tahir H Malik; Jennifer C Lai; Ayse L Mindikoglu; N Thao N Galván; Ronald T Cotton; Christine A O'Mahony; John A Goss; Abbas Rana Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Mitra K Nadim; Joseph DiNorcia; Lingyun Ji; Susan Groshen; Josh Levitsky; Randall S Sung; W Ray Kim; Kenneth Andreoni; David Mulligan; Yuri S Genyk Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Jayme E Locke; Brittany A Shelton; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kimberly A Forde; Deirdre Sawinski; Meagan Gray; Nancy L Ascher Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sumeet K Asrani; Linda W Jennings; W R Kim; Patrick S Kamath; Josh Levitsky; Mitra K Nadim; Giuliano Testa; Michael D Leise; James F Trotter; Goran Klintmalm Journal: Hepatology Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Maria Reig; Alejandro Forner; Jordi Rimola; Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega; Marta Burrel; Ángeles Garcia-Criado; Robin K Kelley; Peter R Galle; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Amit G Singal; Arndt Vogel; Josep Fuster; Carmen Ayuso; Jordi Bruix Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 30.083
Authors: John D Chetwood; Mark G Wells; Tatiana Tsoutsman; Carlo Pulitano; Michael D Crawford; Ken Liu; Simone I Strasser; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Avik Majumdar Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Kelley G Núñez; Tyler Sandow; Jai Patel; Mina Hibino; Daniel Fort; Ari J Cohen; Paul Thevenot Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 6.639