Literature DB >> 21087414

Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.

J C Lai1, N A Terrault, E Vittinghoff, S W Biggins.   

Abstract

This study examined factors associated with the gender disparity in wait-list mortality in the MELD era. Adult patients listed for liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008 were included. Females [12 585(36%)] and males [22 126(64%)] differed clinically by age (54 vs. 52 years), height (1.6 vs. 1.8 m), listing estimated glomerular filtration rate [(eGFR); 70 vs. 83 mL/min] and cirrhosis etiology. Holding MELD constant, females were at 19% (95% CI, 1.13-1.25, p < 0.001) higher risk of wait-list mortality than males under the current allocation system. The relative hazard increased with worsening renal function, whether measured by serum creatinine or eGFR. Adjustment for MELD, age, African-American race, cirrhosis etiology, region and ABO group attenuated this relative hazard (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22; p < 0.001) but additional adjustment for height completely explained this gender disparity in wait-list mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; p = 0.2). Transplantation rates, however, remained lower among females, even after adjustment for height (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92; p < 0.001). In conclusion, under the current liver allocation system, women have a 19% increased risk of wait-list mortality compared to men with the same MELD scores. Height contributes to this gender disparity, possibly reflecting differences in transplantation rates for shorter individuals. ©2010 The Authors Journal compilation©2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087414      PMCID: PMC3059496          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  15 in total

1.  MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.

Authors:  R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites.

Authors:  Andrea E Reid; Maria Resnick; YuChiao Chang; Nathan Buerstatte; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Disparities in liver transplantation in the post-model for end-stage liver disease era: are we there yet?

Authors:  Parul Dureja; Michael R Lucey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores--a systematic bias.

Authors:  E Cholongitas; L Marelli; A Kerry; D W Goodier; D Nair; M Thomas; D Patch; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Is the corrected-creatinine model for end-stage liver disease a feasible strategy to adjust gender difference in organ allocation for liver transplantation?

Authors:  Samantha C Huo; Teh-Ia Huo; Han-Chieh Lin; Chin-Wen Chi; Pui-Ching Lee; Fan-Wei Tseng; Shou-Dong Lee
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006.

Authors:  R B Freeman; D E Steffick; M K Guidinger; D G Farmer; C L Berg; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman; Russell H Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Ann Harper; Robert Merion; Robert Wolfe
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.

Authors:  Cynthia A Moylan; Carla W Brady; Jeffrey L Johnson; Alastair D Smith; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Kidney Failure and Liver Allocation: Current Practices and Potential Improvements.

Authors:  Varun Saxena; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 2.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.

Authors:  Alina M Allen; Julie K Heimbach; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; W Ray Kim; Patrick S Kamath; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Liver disease in women: the influence of gender on epidemiology, natural history, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer Guy; Marion G Peters
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Gender-based disparities in access to and outcomes of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Omobonike O Oloruntoba; Cynthia A Moylan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Ge; Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Richard Gilroy; Evelyn K Hsu; John P Roberts; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Association Between Renal Function Pattern and Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cullaro; Elizabeth C Verna; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.126

9.  Liver-related mortality is similar among men and women with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Nikhilesh R Mazumder; Stela Celaj; Kofi Atiemo; Amna Daud; Kathryn L Jackson; Abel Kho; Josh Levitsky; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Cystatin C Is a Gender-Neutral Glomerular Filtration Rate Biomarker in Patients with Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ayse L Mindikoglu; Antone R Opekun; William E Mitch; Laurence S Magder; Robert H Christenson; Thomas C Dowling; Matthew R Weir; Stephen L Seliger; Charles D Howell; Jean-Pierre Raufman; Abbas Rana; John A Goss; Saira A Khaderi; John M Vierling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.