Literature DB >> 22282507

Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

F S Neves1, T C Souza, S M Almeida, F Haiter-Neto, D Q Freitas, F N Bóscolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of four panoramic radiographic findings, both individually and in association, in predicting the absence of corticalization between the mandibular canal and the third molar on cone beam CT (CBCT) images.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 72 individuals (142 mandibular third molars) who underwent pre-operative radiographic evaluation before extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. On panoramic radiographs, the most common signs of corticalization (darkening of roots, diversion of mandibular canal, narrowing of mandibular canal and interruption of white line) and the presence or absence of corticalization between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on CBCT images were evaluated.
RESULTS: Darkening of roots and interruption of white line associated with the absence of corticalization between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on CBCT images were statistically significant, both as isolated findings (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0006, respectively) and in association (p = 0.002). No statistically significant association was observed for the other panoramic radiographic findings, either individually or in association (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Darkening of roots and interruption of white line observed on panoramic radiographs, both as isolated findings and in association, were effective in determining the risk relationship between the tooth roots and the mandibular canal, requiring three-dimensional evaluation of the case.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282507      PMCID: PMC3608375          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/22263461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  29 in total

1.  Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  C M Ziegler; R Woertche; J Brief; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Giuseppe Monaco; Marco Montevecchi; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Maria Rosaria Antonella Gatto; Luigi Checchi
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  L H S Cevidanes; L J Bailey; G R Tucker; M A Styner; A Mol; C L Phillips; W R Proffit; T Turvey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  C H Kau; S Richmond; J M Palomo; M G Hans
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2005-12

5.  Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Stefanie Steinhäuser; Phillip Geis; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar.

Authors:  L Lysell; M Rohlin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Darkening of third molar roots: panoramic radiographic associations with inferior alveolar nerve exposure.

Authors:  József Szalma; Edina Lempel; Sára Jeges; Lajos Olasz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars.

Authors:  P M Mahasantipiya; N W Savage; P A J Monsour; R J Wilson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.

Authors:  J P Rood; B A Shehab
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  G W Bell
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.651

View more
  27 in total

1.  Role of cone-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of a paradental cyst related to the fusion of a wisdom tooth with a paramolar: A rare case report.

Authors:  Gozde Ozcan; Ahmet Ercan Sekerci; Emrah Soylu; Sinan Nazlim; Mehmet Amuk; Fatma Avci
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 2.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal.

Authors:  Shoaleh Shahidi; Barbod Zamiri; Pegah Bronoosh
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-06-14

4.  Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz; Anne Caroline Costa Oenning; Marcela Graciano Felizardo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.

Authors:  L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus.

Authors:  Luciana J Lopes; Thiago O Gamba; João V J Bertinato; Deborah Q Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Evaluation of mandibular odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma by panoramic radiograph and computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Berretta Moreira Alves; Fabrício Mesquita Tuji; Fábio Abreu Alves; André Caroli Rocha; Alan Roger Dos Santos-Silva; Pablo Agustin Vargas; Márcio Ajudarte Lopes
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Reproducibility of mandibular third molar assessment comparing two cone beam CT units in a matched pairs design.

Authors:  L H Matzen; H Hintze; R Spin-Neto; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars? Methodological and statistical issues.

Authors:  Francielle Silvestre Verner; Daniel Amaral Alves Marlière; Rafael Binato Junqueira; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency.

Authors:  Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Anne Caroline Costa Oenning; Bernardo Barbosa Freire; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.