Literature DB >> 22284851

A multi-biome gap in understanding of crop and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2.

Andrew D B Leakey1, Kristen A Bishop, Elizabeth A Ainsworth.   

Abstract

A key finding from elevated [CO(2)] field experiments is that the impact of elevated [CO(2)] on plant and ecosystem function is highly dependent upon other environmental conditions, namely temperature and the availability of nutrients and soil moisture. In addition, there is significant variation in the response to elevated [CO(2)] among plant functional types, species and crop varieties. However, experimental data on plant and ecosystem responses to elevated [CO(2)] are strongly biased to economically and ecologically important systems in the temperate zone. There is a multi-biome gap in experimental data that is most severe in the tropics and subtropics, but also includes high latitudes. Physiological understanding of the environmental conditions and species found at high and low latitudes suggest they may respond differently to elevated [CO(2)] than well-studied temperate systems. Addressing this knowledge gap should be a high priority as it is vital to understanding 21st century food supply and ecosystem feedbacks on climate change. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284851     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol        ISSN: 1369-5266            Impact factor:   7.834


  10 in total

1.  Disaggregating sorghum yield reductions under warming scenarios exposes narrow genetic diversity in US breeding programs.

Authors:  Jesse Tack; Jane Lingenfelser; S V Krishna Jagadish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Gaps in knowledge and data driving uncertainty in models of photosynthesis.

Authors:  Michael C Dietze
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C Ruane; John Antle; Joshua Elliott; Muhammad Ashfaq; Ashfaq Ahmad Chatta; Frank Ewert; Christian Folberth; Ibrahima Hathie; Petr Havlik; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Dilys S MacCarthy; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Erik Mencos Contreras; Christoph Müller; Ignacio Perez-Dominguez; Meridel Phillips; Cheryl Porter; Rubi M Raymundo; Ronald D Sands; Carl-Friedrich Schleussner; Roberto O Valdivia; Hugo Valin; Keith Wiebe
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Response to elevated CO2 in the temperate C3 grass Festuca arundinaceae across a wide range of soils.

Authors:  Eric A Nord; Raúl E Jaramillo; Jonathan P Lynch
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Leaf Dynamics of Panicum maximum under Future Climatic Changes.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Britto de Assis Prado; Lívia Haik Guedes de Camargo-Bortolin; Érique Castro; Carlos Alberto Martinez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Metabolite and transcript profiling of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) response to elevated [CO2] and temperature.

Authors:  Jessica M Wedow; Craig R Yendrek; Tathyana R Mello; Silvana Creste; Carlos A Martinez; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 7.  The influence of rising tropospheric carbon dioxide and ozone on plant productivity.

Authors:  E A Ainsworth; P Lemonnier; J M Wedow
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.081

8.  Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Enrichment on Landrace and Released Ethiopian Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Cultivars.

Authors:  Mekides Woldegiorgis Gardi; Waqas Ahmed Malik; Bettina I G Haussmann
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07

9.  A meta-analysis of crop response patterns to nitrogen limitation for improved model representation.

Authors:  Verena Seufert; Gustaf Granath; Christoph Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biophysical and economic implications for agriculture of +1.5° and +2.0°C global warming using AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments.

Authors:  Alex C Ruane; John Antle; Joshua Elliott; Christian Folberth; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Christoph Müller; Cheryl Porter; Meridel M Phillips; Rubi M Raymundo; Ronald Sands; Roberto O Valdivia; Jeffrey W White; Keith Wiebe; Cynthia Rosenzweig
Journal:  Clim Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.