| Literature DB >> 30258078 |
Mouhamadou Bamba Sylla1, Jeremy S Pal2, Aissatou Faye3,4,5, Kangbeni Dimobe3, Harald Kunstmann6,7.
Abstract
West Africa is in general limited to rainfed agriculture. It lacks irrigation opportunities and technologies that are applied in many economically developed nations. A warming climate along with an increasing population and wealth has the potential to further strain the region's potential to meet future food needs. In this study, we investigate West Africa's hydrological potential to increase agricultural productivity through the implementation of large-scale water storage and irrigation. A 23-member ensemble of Regional Climate Models is applied to assess changes in hydrologically relevant variables under 2 °C and 1.5 °C global warming scenarios according to the UNFCCC 2015 Conference of Parties (COP 21) agreement. Changes in crop water demand, irrigation water need, water availability and the difference between water availability and irrigation water needs, here referred as basin potential, are presented for ten major river basins covering entire West Africa. Under the 2 °C scenario, crop water demand and irrigation water needs are projected to substantially increase with the largest changes in the Sahel and Gulf of Guinea respectively. At the same time, irrigation potential, which is directly controlled by the climate, is projected to decrease even in regions where water availability increases. This indicates that West African river basins will likely face severe freshwater shortages thus limiting sustainable agriculture. We conclude a general decline in the basin-scale irrigation potential in the event of large-scale irrigation development under 2 °C global warming. Reducing the warming to 1.5 °C decreases these impacts by as much as 50%, suggesting that the region of West Africa clearly benefits from efforts of enhanced mitigation.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258078 PMCID: PMC6158170 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32736-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The West African domain highlighting the different major river basins.
The list of CMIP5 GCMs (see Taylor et al.[26]), the CORDEX RCMs (see Jones et al. 2011) used in this study.
| ALADIN | CanRCM | CRCM | RCA | CCLM | HIRHAM | RACMO | REMO | WRF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCCma-CanESM2 | & | & | & | ||||||
| CNRM-CM5 | & | & | & | ||||||
| EC-EARTH | & | & | & | & | & | ||||
| GFDL-ESM2M | & | ||||||||
| HadGEM2-ES | & | & | & | ||||||
| MPI-ESM-LR | & | & | & | & | |||||
| NCC-NorESM1-M | & | & | & |
The sign “&” means that the particular RCM was used for downscaling the corresponding CMIP5 GCM.
Figure 2Projected changes in Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) using the methods of Hargreaves (Har; left panels) and Hamon (Ham; right panels) for 2 °C global warming scenario (upper panels), 1.5 °C global warming scenario (middle panels) and the difference between the two scenarios (lower panels). Changes for 2 °C and 1.5 °C are expressed as a percent of reference period values. Differences between the changes of the two scenarios are expressed as percent of the 1.5 °C ones. Only areas where changes are significant at 90% are shaded.
Figure 3Projected changes in Irrigation Water Need (IWN) using PET from the methods of Hargreaves (Har; left panels) and Hamon (Ham; right panels) for 2 °C global warming scenario (upper panels), 1.5 °C global warming scenario(middle panels) and the difference between the two scenarios (lower panels). Changes for 2 °C and 1.5 °C are expressed as a percent of reference period values. Differences between the changes of the two scenarios are expressed as percent of the 1.5 °C ones. Only areas where changes are significant at 90% are shaded.
Figure 4Projected changes in Total Runoff for 2 °C global warming scenario (upper panels), 1.5 °C global warming scenario (middle panels) and the difference between the two scenarios (lower panels). Changes for 2 °C and 1.5 °C are expressed as a percent of reference period values. Differences between the changes of the two scenarios are expressed as percent of the 1.5 °C ones. Only areas where changes are significant at 90% are shaded.
Figure 5Box-Whisker-Plots of projected changes in Basin Irrigation Potential (BIP) for the 2 °C global warming scenario (upper panels) and the 1.5 °C global warming scenario (lower panels). Changes for 2 °C and 1.5 °C are expressed as a percent of reference period values. Differences between the changes of the two scenarios are expressed as percent of the 1.5 °C ones.