| Literature DB >> 29610121 |
Alexander Drilon1,2, Romel Somwar3, Biju P Mangatt4, Henrik Edgren5, Patrice Desmeules3, Anja Ruusulehto5, Roger S Smith3, Lukas Delasos3, Morana Vojnic3, Andrew J Plodkowski3, Joshua Sabari3, Kenneth Ng3, Joseph Montecalvo3, Jason Chang3, Huichun Tai3, William W Lockwood6, Victor Martinez6, Gregory J Riely3,2, Charles M Rudin3,2, Mark G Kris3,2, Maria E Arcila3, Christopher Matheny4, Ryma Benayed3, Natasha Rekhtman3, Marc Ladanyi3, Gopinath Ganji4.
Abstract
NRG1 rearrangements are oncogenic drivers that are enriched in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (IMA) of the lung. The oncoprotein binds ERBB3-ERBB2 heterodimers and activates downstream signaling, supporting a therapeutic paradigm of ERBB3/ERBB2 inhibition. As proof of concept, a durable response was achieved with anti-ERBB3 mAb therapy (GSK2849330) in an exceptional responder with an NRG1-rearranged IMA on a phase I trial (NCT01966445). In contrast, response was not achieved with anti-ERBB2 therapy (afatinib) in four patients with NRG1-rearranged IMA (including the index patient post-GSK2849330). Although in vitro data supported the use of either ERBB3 or ERBB2 inhibition, these clinical results were consistent with more profound antitumor activity and downstream signaling inhibition with anti-ERBB3 versus anti-ERBB2 therapy in an NRG1-rearranged patient-derived xenograft model. Analysis of 8,984 and 17,485 tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas and MSK-IMPACT datasets, respectively, identified NRG1 rearrangements with novel fusion partners in multiple histologies, including breast, head and neck, renal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, and uterine cancers.Significance: This series highlights the utility of ERBB3 inhibition as a novel treatment paradigm for NRG1-rearranged cancers. In addition, it provides preliminary evidence that ERBB3 inhibition may be more optimal than ERBB2 inhibition. The identification of NRG1 rearrangements across various solid tumors supports a basket trial approach to drug development. Cancer Discov; 8(6); 686-95. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Wilson and Politi, p. 676This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 663. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29610121 PMCID: PMC5984717 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Discov ISSN: 2159-8274 Impact factor: 39.397