Literature DB >> 31788419

Impact of a single distance phase retrieval algorithm on spatial resolution in X-ray inline phase sensitive imaging.

Muhammad U Ghani1, Bradley Gregory1, Farid Omoumi1, Bin Zheng1, Aimin Yan2, Xizeng Wu2, Hong Liu1.   

Abstract

A single-projection based phase retrieval method based on the phase attenuation duality principle (PAD) was used to compare the spatial resolution of the acquired phase sensitive and PAD processed phase retrieved images. An inline phase sensitive prototype was used to acquire the phase sensitive images. The prototype incorporates a micro-focus x-ray source and a flat panel detector with a 50 μm pixel pitch. A phantom composed of a 2 cm thick 50-50 adipose-glandular mimicking slab sandwiched with a 0.82 cm thick slanted PMMA sharp edge was used. Phase sensitive image of the phantom was acquired at 120 kV, 3.35 mAs with a 16 μm tube focal spot size under a geometric magnification (M) of 2.5. The PAD based method was applied to the acquired phase sensitive image for the retrieval of phase values. With necessary data processing, modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were determined for the estimation and comparison of the spatial resolution. The PAD processed phase retrieved values of the phantom were in good agreement with the theoretically calculated values. Phase sensitive images showed higher spatial resolution at all spatial frequencies compared to the phase retrieved images. It was noted that the high-frequency signal components in the retrieved image were suppressed that resulted in lower MTF values. When compared to the phase sensitive image, the cutoff resolution (10% MTF) for phase retrieved image dropped 32% from 15.6 lp/mm (32μm) to 10.6 lp/mm (47μm). The resolution offered by this phase sensitive prototype is radiographically enough to detect breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-energy phase contrast imaging; phase retrieval; spatial resolution

Year:  2019        PMID: 31788419      PMCID: PMC6883648          DOI: 10.3233/BSI-190186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Spectrosc Imaging        ISSN: 2212-8794


  43 in total

1.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.

Authors:  Egbert Buhr; Susanne Günther-Kohfahl; Ulrich Neitzel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A general theoretical formalism for X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Optimization of propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  P Baran; S Pacile; Y I Nesterets; S C Mayo; C Dullin; D Dreossi; F Arfelli; D Thompson; D Lockie; M McCormack; S T Taba; F Brun; M Pinamonti; C Nickson; C Hall; M Dimmock; F Zanconati; M Cholewa; H Quiney; P C Brennan; G Tromba; T E Gureyev
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  X-Ray cone-beam phase tomography formulas based on phase-attenuation duality.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Phase retrieval from one single phase contrast x-ray image.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Aimin Yan
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Phase retrieval in quantitative x-ray microtomography with a single sample-to-detector distance.

Authors:  R C Chen; H L Xie; L Rigon; R Longo; E Castelli; T Q Xiao
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

9.  Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography.

Authors:  Zhentian Wang; Nik Hauser; Gad Singer; Mafalda Trippel; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Christof W Schneider; Marco Stampanoni
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Molly D Wong; Di Wu; Bin Zheng; Laurie L Fajardo; Aimin Yan; Janis Fuh; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Potential of Utilizing Mid-Energy X-Rays for In-Line Phase Sensitive Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  F H Omoumi; M U Ghani; M D Wong; Y Li; B Zheng; A Yan; P A Jenkins; X Wu; H Liu
Journal:  Biomed Spectrosc Imaging       Date:  2020-12-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.