Literature DB >> 29606707

Improving Pharmacy Calculations Using an Instructional Design Model.

Marie Davies1,2, Doreen Pon1, Linda S Garavalia1.   

Abstract

Objective. To describe an evidence-based instructional design to improve performance and foster retention of pharmacy students' calculation skills longitudinally across the curriculum. Methods. Gagne's nine events of instructional design were employed in a longitudinal pharmacy calculations curriculum. Mean pharmacy calculation examination scores from four courses spanning the didactic curriculum for four different academic years (before and after the redesign) were compared. Results. Students demonstrated more stable outcomes with consistently higher means after the redesign, which may indicate improved retention. Additionally, the post-redesign classes have experienced fewer failures (score of <80%). Conclusion. Using an instructional design model to optimize immediate instructional outcomes is an effective method of enhancing retention of calculation skills over time.

Keywords:  Gagne; calculations; instructional design; retention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29606707      PMCID: PMC5869749          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  A self-paced course in pharmaceutical mathematics using web-based databases.

Authors:  David W A Bourne; A Machelle Davison
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Pharmaceutical calculations instruction and assessment in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael C Brown; Angela Hanggi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design.

Authors:  Telle Hailikari; Nina Katajavuori; Sari Lindblom-Ylanne
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Impact of a required pharmaceutical calculations course on mathematics ability and knowledge retention.

Authors:  Michael A Hegener; Shauna M Buring; Elizabeth Papas
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Cecilia M Plaza; Cindy D Stowe; Evan T Robinson; Gary DeLander; Diane E Beck; Russell B Melchert; Robert B Supernaw; Victoria F Roche; Brenda L Gleason; Mark N Strong; Amanda Bain; Gerald E Meyer; Betty J Dong; Jeffrey Rochon; Patty Johnston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Assessment of streams of knowledge, skill, and attitude development across the doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Susan E Conway; Melissa S Medina; Nancy A Letassy; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Using Gagne's 9 Events of Instruction to Enhance Student Performance and Course Evaluations in Undergraduate Nursing Course.

Authors:  Amy Miner; Jennifer Mallow; Laurie Theeke; Emily Barnes
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.082

8.  Pharmacy student performance on constructed-response versus selected-response calculations questions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sheaffer; Richard T Addo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  How to use Gagne's model of instructional design in teaching psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Kayvan Khadjooi; Kamran Rostami; Sauid Ishaq
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2011
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Student Performance with Standalone Calculations Course vs Combined Pharmaceutics-Calculations Course.

Authors:  Renee McCafferty; Venkatareddy Nadithe
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Identifying Low Pharmaceutical Calculation Performers Using an Algebra-Based Pretest.

Authors:  Benjamin D Aronson; Emily Eddy; Brittany Long; Olivia K Welch; Jennifer Grundey; Jessica L Hinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.