Literature DB >> 23459503

Pharmacy student performance on constructed-response versus selected-response calculations questions.

Elizabeth A Sheaffer1, Richard T Addo.   

Abstract

Objective. To introduce PharmD students to changes in calculations question types (constructed-response versus selected-response questions); measure and compare student performance on constructed-response and selected-response questions in a pharmaceutics course; and collect student feedback on the use of differing question types.Methods A pharmaceutics/pharmaceutical calculations examination was administered that included 15 pairs of questions; each pair consisted of a constructed-response question and a similar selected-response question. An online questionnaire was conducted to collect student feedback.Results. Of the 15 topics, the class scored higher on the constructed-response question for 4 topics and higher on the selected-response question for 10 topics. Eighty percent of the class preferred selected-response questions, although 47.8% felt constructed-response questions better prepared them for a career in healthcare.Conclusions. Students correctly answered more selected-response questions than constructed-response questions and felt more confident in doing so. Additional constructed-response teaching and testing methods should be incorporated into pharmacy education.

Keywords:  NAPLEX; constructed response; pharmaceutical calculations; question type; selected response

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23459503      PMCID: PMC3578338          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  4 in total

1.  The need to evaluate question writers' views and the costs of constructed-response versus selected-response calculations questions.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Improving Pharmacy Calculations Using an Instructional Design Model.

Authors:  Marie Davies; Doreen Pon; Linda S Garavalia
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Identifying Low Pharmaceutical Calculation Performers Using an Algebra-Based Pretest.

Authors:  Benjamin D Aronson; Emily Eddy; Brittany Long; Olivia K Welch; Jennifer Grundey; Jessica L Hinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Evaluation of the effect of items' format and type on psychometric properties of sixth year pharmacy students clinical clerkship assessment items.

Authors:  Hatim S AlKhatib; Gayle Brazeau; Amal Akour; Suha A Almuhaissen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.