Andrea Igoren Guaricci1,2, Valentina Lorenzoni3, Marco Guglielmo4, Saima Mushtaq4, Giuseppe Muscogiuri4,5, Filippo Cademartiri6, Mark Rabbat7,8, Daniele Andreini4,9, Gaetano Serviddio2, Nicola Gaibazzi10, Mauro Pepi4, Gianluca Pontone4. 1. Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Policlinico, Bari, Italy. 2. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. 3. Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. 4. Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 5. C.M.O., Torre Annunziata, Naples, Italy. 6. SDN, IRCCS, Naples, Italy. 7. Center for Heart and Vascular Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Center for Heart and Vascular Medicine, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois. 9. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 10. Department of Cardiology, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the incremental prognostic benefit of carotid artery disease and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) features in addition to clinical evaluation in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, 10-year Framingham risk score together with carotid ultrasound and coronary computed tomography angiography were evaluated for prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: We enrolled 517 consecutive asymptomatic patients (63% male, mean age 64 ±10 years; 17.6% with diabetes). Median (interquartile range) coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was 34 (0-100). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 (3.4-5.1) years, there were 53 MACE (10%). Patients experiencing MACE had higher CACS, incidence of carotid disease, presence of CAD ≥50%, and remodeled plaque as compared with patients without MACE. At multivariable analyses, presence of CAD ≥50% (HR: 5.14, 95% CI: 2.1-12.4) and percentage of segments with remodeled plaque (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06) independently predicted MACE (P < 0.001). Models adding CAD ≥50% or percentage of segments with remodeled plaque resulted in higher discrimination and reclassification ability compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS. Specifically, the C-statistic improved to 0.75 with addition of CAD and 0.84 when adding percentage of segments with remodeled plaque, whereas net reclassification improvement indices were 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an asymptomatic population, CAD and plaque positive remodeling increase MACE prediction compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS estimation. In the diabetes subgroup, percentage of segments with remodeled plaque was the only predictor of MACE.
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the incremental prognostic benefit of carotid artery disease and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) features in addition to clinical evaluation in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, 10-year Framingham risk score together with carotid ultrasound and coronary computed tomography angiography were evaluated for prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: We enrolled 517 consecutive asymptomatic patients (63% male, mean age 64 ±10 years; 17.6% with diabetes). Median (interquartile range) coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was 34 (0-100). Over a median follow-up of 4.4 (3.4-5.1) years, there were 53 MACE (10%). Patients experiencing MACE had higher CACS, incidence of carotid disease, presence of CAD ≥50%, and remodeled plaque as compared with patients without MACE. At multivariable analyses, presence of CAD ≥50% (HR: 5.14, 95% CI: 2.1-12.4) and percentage of segments with remodeled plaque (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06) independently predicted MACE (P < 0.001). Models adding CAD ≥50% or percentage of segments with remodeled plaque resulted in higher discrimination and reclassification ability compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS. Specifically, the C-statistic improved to 0.75 with addition of CAD and 0.84 when adding percentage of segments with remodeled plaque, whereas net reclassification improvement indices were 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an asymptomatic population, CAD and plaque positive remodeling increase MACE prediction compared with a model based on 10-year FRS, carotid disease, and CACS estimation. In the diabetes subgroup, percentage of segments with remodeled plaque was the only predictor of MACE.
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P-J Touboul; M G Hennerici; S Meairs; H Adams; P Amarenco; N Bornstein; L Csiba; M Desvarieux; S Ebrahim; R Hernandez Hernandez; M Jaff; S Kownator; T Naqvi; P Prati; T Rundek; M Sitzer; U Schminke; J-C Tardif; A Taylor; E Vicaut; K S Woo Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Iksung Cho; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Sanghoon Shin; Ji Min Sung; Fay Y Lin; Stephan Achenbach; Ran Heo; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Tracy Q Callister; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Filippo Cademartiri; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Allison M Dunning; Augustin DeLago; Todd C Villines; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Jonathon Leipsic; Leslee J Shaw; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Yong-Jin Kim; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Gianluca Pontone; Daniele Andreini; James K Min Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone; Laura Fusini; Maria De Luca; Francesco Pio Cafarelli; Marco Guglielmo; Andrea Baggiano; Virginia Beltrama; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Saima Mushtaq; Edoardo Conte; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Daniele Andreini; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Matteo Di Biase; Antonio L Bartorelli; Mauro Pepi Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Caroline S Fox; Sherita Hill Golden; Cheryl Anderson; George A Bray; Lora E Burke; Ian H de Boer; Prakash Deedwania; Robert H Eckel; Abby G Ershow; Judith Fradkin; Silvio E Inzucchi; Mikhail Kosiborod; Robert G Nelson; Mahesh J Patel; Michael Pignone; Laurie Quinn; Philip R Schauer; Elizabeth Selvin; Dorothea K Vafiadis Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Huayu Zhang; Edwin O W Bredewold; Dianne Vreeken; Jacques M G J Duijs; Hetty C de Boer; Adriaan O Kraaijeveld; J Wouter Jukema; Nico H Pijls; Johannes Waltenberger; Erik A L Biessen; Eric P van der Veer; Anton Jan van Zonneveld; Janine M van Gils Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Francesca Baessato; Marco Guglielmo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Stefano Scafuri; Mario Babbaro; Rocco Mollace; Ada Collevecchio; Andrea I Guaricci; Gianluca Pontone Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Marly Van Assen; Christian Tesche; Carlo N De Cecco; Mattia Chiesa; Stefano Scafuri; Marco Guglielmo; Andrea Baggiano; Laura Fusini; Andrea I Guaricci; Mark G Rabbat; Gianluca Pontone Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 3.411