Demetrios Doukas1, Sorcha Allen1, Amy Wozniak2, Siri Kunchakarra3, Rina Verma4, Jessica Marot2, John J Lopez1, Koen Nieman5, Gianluca Pontone6, Jonathon Leipsic7, Jeroen Bax8, Mark G Rabbat1. 1. Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, UCSF Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA 93701, USA. 4. Division of Cardiology, Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Elk Grove Village, IL 69997, USA. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 6. Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Cardiologico Monzino, Via Carlo Parea, 4, 20138 Milan, Italy. 7. Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. 8. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, functional stress testing is the primary imaging modality for patients with stable symptoms suspected to represent coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is excellent at identifying anatomic coronary artery disease (CAD). The application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary CTA allows fractional flow reserve (FFR) to be calculated noninvasively (FFRCT). The relationship of noninvasive stress testing to coronary CTA and FFRCT in real-world clinical practice has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated 206 consecutive patients at Loyola University Chicago with suspected CAD who underwent noninvasive stress testing followed by coronary CTA and FFRCT when indicated. Patients were categorized by stress test results (positive, negative, indeterminate, and equivocal). Duke treadmill score (DTS), METS, exercise duration, and chest pain with exercise were analyzed. Lesions ≥ 50%stenosis were considered positive by coronary CTA. FFRCT < 0.80 was considered diagnostic of ischemia. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients had paired noninvasive stress test and coronary CTA/FFRCT results. The median time from stress test to coronary CTA was 49 days. Average patient age was 60.3 years, and 42% were male. Of the 206 stress tests, 75% were exercise (70% echocardiographic, 26% nuclear, and 4% EKG). There were no associations of stress test results with CAD > 50% or FFRCT < 0.80 (p = 0.927 and p = 0.910, respectively). Of those with a positive stress test, only 30% (3/10) had CAD > 50% and only 50% (5/10) had FFRCT < 0.80. Chest pain with exercise did not correlate with CAD > 50% or FFRCT < 0.80 (p = 0.66 and p = 0.12, respectively). There were no significant correlations between METS, DTS, or exercise duration and FFRCT (r = 0.093, p = 0.274; r = 0.012, p = 0.883; and r = 0.034, p = 0.680; respectively). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive stress testing, functional capacity, chest pain with exercise, and DTS are not associated with anatomic or functional CAD using a diagnostic strategy of coronary CTA and FFRCT.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, functional stress testing is the primary imaging modality for patients with stable symptoms suspected to represent coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is excellent at identifying anatomic coronary artery disease (CAD). The application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary CTA allows fractional flow reserve (FFR) to be calculated noninvasively (FFRCT). The relationship of noninvasive stress testing to coronary CTA and FFRCT in real-world clinical practice has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated 206 consecutive patients at Loyola University Chicago with suspected CAD who underwent noninvasive stress testing followed by coronary CTA and FFRCT when indicated. Patients were categorized by stress test results (positive, negative, indeterminate, and equivocal). Duke treadmill score (DTS), METS, exercise duration, and chest pain with exercise were analyzed. Lesions ≥ 50%stenosis were considered positive by coronary CTA. FFRCT < 0.80 was considered diagnostic of ischemia. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients had paired noninvasive stress test and coronary CTA/FFRCT results. The median time from stress test to coronary CTA was 49 days. Average patient age was 60.3 years, and 42% were male. Of the 206 stress tests, 75% were exercise (70% echocardiographic, 26% nuclear, and 4% EKG). There were no associations of stress test results with CAD > 50% or FFRCT < 0.80 (p = 0.927 and p = 0.910, respectively). Of those with a positive stress test, only 30% (3/10) had CAD > 50% and only 50% (5/10) had FFRCT < 0.80. Chest pain with exercise did not correlate with CAD > 50% or FFRCT < 0.80 (p = 0.66 and p = 0.12, respectively). There were no significant correlations between METS, DTS, or exercise duration and FFRCT (r = 0.093, p = 0.274; r = 0.012, p = 0.883; and r = 0.034, p = 0.680; respectively). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive stress testing, functional capacity, chest pain with exercise, and DTS are not associated with anatomic or functional CAD using a diagnostic strategy of coronary CTA and FFRCT.
Authors: Mark A Hlatky; Bernard De Bruyne; Gianluca Pontone; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Pamela S Douglas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patricia A Pellikka; Adelaide Arruda-Olson; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ming Hui Chen; Jane E Marshall; Thomas R Porter; Stephen G Sawada Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Rupert K Hung; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; John W McEvoy; Seamus P Whelton; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir; John R Schairer; Clinton Brawner; Mohsen Alam; Steven J Keteyian; Michael J Blaha Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Carlos J Rodriguez; Laura Loehr; Wayne D Rosamond; Dalane Kitzman; David Couper; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David J Maron; Judith S Hochman; Harmony R Reynolds; Sripal Bangalore; Sean M O'Brien; William E Boden; Bernard R Chaitman; Roxy Senior; Jose López-Sendón; Karen P Alexander; Renato D Lopes; Leslee J Shaw; Jeffrey S Berger; Jonathan D Newman; Mandeep S Sidhu; Shaun G Goodman; Witold Ruzyllo; Gilbert Gosselin; Aldo P Maggioni; Harvey D White; Balram Bhargava; James K Min; G B John Mancini; Daniel S Berman; Michael H Picard; Raymond Y Kwong; Ziad A Ali; Daniel B Mark; John A Spertus; Mangalath N Krishnan; Ahmed Elghamaz; Nagaraja Moorthy; Whady A Hueb; Marcin Demkow; Kreton Mavromatis; Olga Bockeria; Jesus Peteiro; Todd D Miller; Hanna Szwed; Rolf Doerr; Matyas Keltai; Joseph B Selvanayagam; P Gabriel Steg; Claes Held; Shun Kohsaka; Stavroula Mavromichalis; Ruth Kirby; Neal O Jeffries; Frank E Harrell; Frank W Rockhold; Samuel Broderick; T Bruce Ferguson; David O Williams; Robert A Harrington; Gregg W Stone; Yves Rosenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 91.245