Literature DB >> 29603978

Chromatic induction in space and time.

Andrew J Coia, Steven K Shevell.   

Abstract

The color appearance of a light depends on variation in the complete visual field over both space and time. In the spatial domain, a chromatic stimulus within a patterned chromatic surround can appear a different hue than the same stimulus within a uniform surround. In the temporal domain, a stimulus presented as an element of a continuously changing chromaticity can appear a different color compared to the identical stimulus, presented simultaneously but viewed alone. This is the flash-lag effect for color, which has an analog in the domain of motion: a pulsed object seen alone can appear to lag behind an identical pulsed object that is an element of a motion sequence. Studies of the flash-lag effect for motion have considered whether it is mediated by a neural representation for the moving physical stimulus or, alternatively, for the perceived motion. The current study addresses this question for the flash-lag effect for color by testing whether the color flash lag depends on a representation of only the changing chromatic stimulus or, alternatively, its color percept, which can be altered by chromatic induction.
METHODS: baseline measurements for spatial chromatic induction determined the chromaticity of a flashed ring within a uniform surround that matched a flashed ring within a patterned surround. Baseline measurements for the color flash-lag effect determined the chromaticity of a pulsed ring presented alone (within a uniform surround) that matched a pulsed ring presented in a sequence of changing chromaticity over time (also within a uniform surround). Finally, the main experiments combined chromatic induction from a patterned surround and the flash-lag effect, in three conditions: (1) both the changing and pulsed rings were within a patterned chromatic surround; (2) the changing ring was within a patterned surround and the pulsed ring within a uniform surround; and (3) the changing ring was within a uniform surround and the pulsed ring within a patterned surround.
RESULTS: the flash-lag measurements for a changing chromaticity were affected by perceptual changes induced by the surrounding chromatic pattern. Thus, the color shifts induced by a chromatic surround are incorporated in the neural representation mediating the flash-lag effect for color.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603978      PMCID: PMC6022834          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.00B223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  21 in total

1.  Spatial structure of cone inputs to color cells in alert macaque primary visual cortex (V-1).

Authors:  B R Conway
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones.

Authors:  B R Sheth; R Nijhawan; S Shimojo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Romi Nijhawan; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Large shifts in color appearance from patterned chromatic backgrounds.

Authors:  Patrick Monnier; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Chromatic induction from S-cone patterns.

Authors:  Patrick Monnier; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Chromatic assimilation: spread light or neural mechanism?

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Cyclopean flash-lag illusion.

Authors:  Dylan Nieman; Romi Nijhawan; Beena Khurana; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Flash lag in depth.

Authors:  Laurence R Harris; Philip A Duke; Agnieszka Kopinska
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The flash-lag effect during illusory chopstick rotation.

Authors:  Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.