Literature DB >> 10769390

Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones.

B R Sheth1, R Nijhawan, S Shimojo.   

Abstract

Continuous, predictable events and spontaneous events may coincide in the visual environment. For a continuously moving object, the brain compensates for delays in transmission between a retinal event and neural responses in higher visual areas. Here we show that it similarly compensated for other smoothly changing features. A disk was flashed briefly during the presentation of another disk of continuously changing color, and observers compared the colors of the disks at the moment of flash. We also tested luminance, spatial frequency and pattern entropy; for all features, the continuously changing item led the flashed item in feature space. Thus the visual system's ability to compensate for delays in information about a continuously changing stimulus may extend to all features. We propose a model based on backward masking and priming to explain the phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10769390     DOI: 10.1038/74865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  23 in total

1.  Vestibular signals can distort the perceived spatial relationship of retinal stimuli.

Authors:  R H Cai; K Jacobson; R Baloh; M Schlag-Rey; J Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Independent coding of object motion and position revealed by distinct contingent aftereffects.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; Kami Koldewyn; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Evolution of a predictive internal model in an embodied and situated agent.

Authors:  Onofrio Gigliotta; Giovanni Pezzulo; Stefano Nolfi; Sefano Nolfi
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Feature binding of a continuously changing object.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.