Literature DB >> 16469350

Flash lag in depth.

Laurence R Harris1, Philip A Duke, Agnieszka Kopinska.   

Abstract

The perceived position of a moving target at a particular point in time, indicated by a flash, is often judged to be different from its actual location. Here, we show that the position of a target moving in depth is also systematically mislocalized. We used three types of targets moving in depth at a range of speeds from 2 to 16 cm/s. (i) A target realistically rendered that included concordant looming, disparity, and perspective cues. (ii) A random dot surface whose depth was defined by disparity, without concordant perspective or looming cues. (iii) A surface of dynamic random dots whose depth was defined by disparity with no consistent motion visible monocularly. Subjects viewed the targets moving either towards or away from them and indicated whether the targets appeared to be nearer or farther than a continuously present reference depth at the moment that a flash was presented. A staircase procedure was used to null, and thus measure, any perceptual displacement from the reference depth. A flash lag in depth was found in which the target appeared ahead of its true position, displaced by a constant amount of time depending on the stimulus type and the direction of motion (towards or away). The time displacement varied from 76 ms (for the realistic target moving away from the observer) to 263 ms (for static random dots moving towards). These effects may depend on the confidence with which subjects were able to judge the location of our various targets: greater confidence leading to a smaller temporal displacement.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469350     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth.

Authors:  Gojko Žaric; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Shigeaki Nishina; Peter De Weerd; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Chromatic induction in space and time.

Authors:  Andrew J Coia; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Cortical processing and perceived timing.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Paul Wilcock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The Flash-lag Effect in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.