Literature DB >> 12445850

Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion.

Katsumi Watanabe1, Romi Nijhawan, Shinsuke Shimojo.   

Abstract

Moving stimuli cause the position of flashed stimuli to appear shifted in the direction of motion (position capture). To examine whether position capture depends on low-level motion interactions or perception of integrated object motion, we employed a slit-view display. Two line-drawn diamonds translated horizontally in opposite directions, one above and one below the fixation cross, either behind an occluding surface with a narrow slit or without occluding surface. When the diamonds were in vertical alignment, two vertical bars were flashed, one in the center of each diamond. In the slit-view condition, the diamonds were visible through a 4-, 2-, or 1-pixel vertical slit; the width of the flashed bars always matched the width of the slit. Even though the horizontal component of physical motion was greatly reduced or absent in the slit-view conditions, observers perceived diamonds moving behind the occluding surface. Furthermore, the position of the flashed bar was captured by the moving diamonds such that each bar appeared shifted in the direction of perceived motion. We conclude that the position capture reported here has a component based on high-level motion processing that is responsible for dynamically integrating object motion and shape.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12445850     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00296-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Independent coding of object motion and position revealed by distinct contingent aftereffects.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; Kami Koldewyn; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Chromatic induction in space and time.

Authors:  Andrew J Coia; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization.

Authors:  Peter U Tse; David Whitney; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Motion-Induced Position Shifts Activate Early Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Kohler; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The spatial and temporal construction of confidence in the visual scene.

Authors:  Martin Graziano; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.