Literature DB >> 29603000

Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions.

Nobu Nishioka1, Takeshi Ogura2, Yoshitaka Kurisu3, Miyuki Imanishi1, Saori Onda1, Wataru Takagi1, Tatsushi Sano1, Atsushi Okuda1, Akira Miyano1, Mio Amano1, Kazuhide Higuchi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been established as a method to obtain tissues of various organs. To obtain sufficient tissue has clinical impact to facilitate the diagnosis by clinical pathologists, the assessment and subtyping of various neoplasms, and for further immunohistochemical investigations of tumor type. Recently, a novel 20G core trap with a forward-cutting beveled FNA needle (ProC-F) has become available. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions using this needle. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: In this study, the first puncture was performed using the ProC-F. Only tissue obtained with the first puncture using the ProC-F was used to evaluate diagnostic yield of ProC-F. The second puncture was performed using a 22G standard FNA needle using the same technique as for the first puncture. Second puncture was performed if the endosonographer did not feel that sufficient tissue had not been obtained by first puncture.
RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions were prospectively enrolled. The technical success rate of EUS-FNA using the ProC-F was 98.1% (52/53). The rate of adequate tissue obtained by ProC-F was 96.2% (50/52). On the other hand, the rate of adequate tissue obtained by the standard needle was 71.1%. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of the ProC-F and the standard needle were 92.5, 100, 100, 76.9, and 94.0%, and 85.2, 100, 100, 55.6, and 87.5%, respectively. Diagnostic yield of ProC-F about sensitivity (P = 0.027), NPV (P = 0.035), and accuracy (P = 0.004) was significantly higher than of standard needle. Adverse events were not seen in any patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Although only tissue obtained by the first puncture was evaluated, the rate of adequate tissue and the histologic diagnostic yield for pancreatic lesions were extremely high using the ProC-F.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EUS; Endoscopic ultrasound; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; Forward-cutting bevel needle; Pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29603000     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6155-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Clinical impact of K-ras mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA specimens from pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogura; Kenji Yamao; Akira Sawaki; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Susumu Hijioka; Yasumasa Niwa; Masahiro Tajika; Shinya Kondo; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Vikram Bhatia; Kazuhide Higuchi; Waki Hosoda; Yasushi Yatabe
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarto C Paquin; Gilles Gariépy; Luigi Lepanto; Raymond Bourdages; Ginette Raymond; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Glenn M Eisen; Lars Aabakken; Todd H Baron; Matt M Hutter; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Albert Nemcek; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Irving M Pike; Linda Rabeneck; Joseph Romagnuolo; John J Vargo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  EUS-guided tissue acquisition: Do we need to shoot for a "core" to score?

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Raj J Shah
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kajsa E Affolter; Robert L Schmidt; Anna P Matynia; Douglas G Adler; Rachel E Factor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Prospective evaluation of new 22 gauge endoscopic ultrasound core needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique for intra-abdominal solid masses.

Authors:  Woo Hyun Paik; Yangsoon Park; Do Hyun Park; Seung-Mo Hong; Byung Uk Lee; Jun-Ho Choi; Sang Soo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.

Authors:  Pujan Kandel; Ghassan Tranesh; Aziza Nassar; Russell Bingham; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy A Woodward; Victoria Gomez; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Impact of EUS-FNA for preoperative para-aortic lymph node staging in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer.

Authors:  Akira Kurita; Yuzo Kodama; Yuji Nakamoto; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Kenichi Yoshimura; Katsutoshi Kuriyama; Yugo Sawai; Norimitsu Uza; Etsuro Hatano; Shinji Uemoto; Kaori Togashi; Hironori Haga; Tsutomu Chiba
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Randomized trial comparing a side-port needle and standard needle for EUS-guided histology of pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Tsuyoshi Hayashi; Hiroshi Kawakami; Hiroyuki Isayama; Hiroyuki Hisai; Takao Itoi; Michihiro Ono; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Mariko Tanaka; Fumihide Itokawa; Hisashi Oshiro; Tomoko Sonoda; Tadashi Hasegawa
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Mary Lou Jondal; Jonathan Clain; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing 25-gauge and 20-gauge biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Eunae Cho; Chang-Hwan Park; Tae Hyeon Kim; Chang-Min Cho; Dong Wan Seo; Jaihwan Kim; Jun Ho Choi; Sung-Hoon Moon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Yukitaka Yamashita; Hiroko Akamatsu; Maiko Ikenouchi; Tatsuya Ishii; Hisakazu Matsumoto; Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Yasuki Nakatani; Keiichi Hatamaru; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Akamatsu; Yoshito Uenoyama; Tomohiro Watanabe; Kazuo Ono; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.