Akira Kurita1, Yuzo Kodama2, Yuji Nakamoto3, Hiroyoshi Isoda3, Sachiko Minamiguchi4, Kenichi Yoshimura5, Katsutoshi Kuriyama2, Yugo Sawai2, Norimitsu Uza2, Etsuro Hatano6, Shinji Uemoto6, Kaori Togashi3, Hironori Haga4, Tsutomu Chiba2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Center, Kitano Hospital, The Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 5. Innovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan. 6. Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with pancreatobiliary cancer, para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is considered to be the involvement beyond the regional lymph nodes, namely, distant metastasis. Effective methods for preoperative PALN staging, however, are not established. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capability for PALN metastasis between EUS-FNA and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT). METHODS: We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center trial. Between December 2010 and March 2014, 208 patients with pancreatobiliary cancer without apparent distant metastasis except for PALNs were assessed for study eligibility before surgery. Among them, 52 consecutive patients with PALN enlargement were enrolled in the study. (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and EUS-FNA were performed sequentially as a single combined procedure to evaluate PALN metastases. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA and PET/CT for PALN metastasis. RESULTS: Of 71 enlarged PALNs in the 52 patients, 30 (42.3%) were finally diagnosed as metastases in 21 patients (40.4%). Of the 21 patients with PALN metastases, preoperative EUS-FNA or PET/CT made a correct diagnosis in 20 (95.2%) or 12 (57.1%), respectively. EUS-FNA had higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PALN metastasis (sensitivity, 96.7% [29/30]; 95% confidence interval, 82.2%-99.9%; specificity, 100% [39/39]; 95% confidence interval, 91.0%-100%) than PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is superior to PET/CT for preoperative PALN staging in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. Because of the clinical benefit of EUS-FNA to reduce unnecessary surgery, it should be part of the standard preoperative examination for patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. (UMIN clinical trials registry number: 000006408.).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with pancreatobiliary cancer, para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is considered to be the involvement beyond the regional lymph nodes, namely, distant metastasis. Effective methods for preoperative PALN staging, however, are not established. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capability for PALN metastasis between EUS-FNA and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT). METHODS: We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center trial. Between December 2010 and March 2014, 208 patients with pancreatobiliary cancer without apparent distant metastasis except for PALNs were assessed for study eligibility before surgery. Among them, 52 consecutive patients with PALN enlargement were enrolled in the study. (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and EUS-FNA were performed sequentially as a single combined procedure to evaluate PALN metastases. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA and PET/CT for PALN metastasis. RESULTS: Of 71 enlarged PALNs in the 52 patients, 30 (42.3%) were finally diagnosed as metastases in 21 patients (40.4%). Of the 21 patients with PALN metastases, preoperative EUS-FNA or PET/CT made a correct diagnosis in 20 (95.2%) or 12 (57.1%), respectively. EUS-FNA had higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PALN metastasis (sensitivity, 96.7% [29/30]; 95% confidence interval, 82.2%-99.9%; specificity, 100% [39/39]; 95% confidence interval, 91.0%-100%) than PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is superior to PET/CT for preoperative PALN staging in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. Because of the clinical benefit of EUS-FNA to reduce unnecessary surgery, it should be part of the standard preoperative examination for patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. (UMIN clinical trials registry number: 000006408.).
Authors: Rupaly Pande; Shafiq Chughtai; Manish Ahuja; Rachel Brown; David C Bartlett; Bobby V Dasari; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius Mirza; Keith Roberts; John Isaac; Robert P Sutcliffe; Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-05-27