Literature DB >> 24921417

Prospective evaluation of new 22 gauge endoscopic ultrasound core needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique for intra-abdominal solid masses.

Woo Hyun Paik1, Yangsoon Park, Do Hyun Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Byung Uk Lee, Jun-Ho Choi, Sang Soo Lee, Dong-Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

GOALS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy and diagnostic yield of the histologic core obtained with a 22 G endoscopic ultrasound histology needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique without on-site cytopathologist.
BACKGROUND: No standard technique for new EUS histology needle has been established. STUDY: A total of 125 consecutive patients with intra-abdominal solid masses were enrolled prospectively between October 2011 and March 2013. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with a 22 G histology needle using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 133 EUS-FNB procedures targeting the pancreas, lymph node, retroperitoneal mass, ampulla of Vater, gallbladder, common bile duct, duodenum, and liver were performed in 125 patients. EUS-FNB was technically feasible in all cases, and a visible core was obtained in 128 cases (96%). Histologic core specimens suitable for pathologic assessment were reported in 111 cases (83%). There were no procedure-related adverse events. According to the determinants of malignancy with EUS-FNB, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 85%, 98%, 99%, 77%, and 89%, respectively. In addition, histologic architecture with or without immunohistochemical staining of the core biopsy specimens was useful for pathologic confirmation in 101 cases (76%).
CONCLUSIONS: A 22 G EUS-FNB using capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique showed a high diagnostic yield and histologic core acquisition for the histologic diagnosis of various intra-abdominal masses without an on-site cytopathologist. Furthermore, a histologic core with or without immunohistochemical staining was helpful for clinical decision making in 76% of the intra-abdominal solid masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24921417     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  14 in total

1.  Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Payal Saxena; Mohamad El Zein; Tyler Stevens; Ahmed Abdelgelil; Sepideh Besharati; Ahmed Messallam; Vivek Kumbhari; Alba Azola; Jennifer Brainard; Eun Ji Shin; Anne Marie Lennon; Marcia I Canto; Vikesh K Singh; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linbin Chen; Yin Li; Xiaoyan Gao; Shiyong Lin; Longjun He; Guangyu Luo; Jianjun Li; Chunyu Huang; Guobao Wang; Qing Yang; Hongbo Shan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A prospective randomized trial of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using a 25-gauge core biopsy needle with and without a stylet.

Authors:  Min Jae Yang; Jae Chul Hwang; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Dakeun Lee; Hyunee Lim; Young Bae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

5.  Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors.

Authors:  Joon Seop Lee; Chang Min Cho; Yong Hwan Kwon; An Na Seo; Han Ik Bae; Man-Hoon Han
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-08-17

6.  Prospective histological evaluation of a 20G core trap with a forward-cutting bevel needle for EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Nobu Nishioka; Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Miyuki Imanishi; Saori Onda; Wataru Takagi; Tatsushi Sano; Atsushi Okuda; Akira Miyano; Mio Amano; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Diagnostic accuracy of 22/25-gauge core needle in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyoung-Chul Oh; Hyun Kang; Jae Young Lee; Geun Joo Choi; Jung Sik Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Extramedullary plasmacytoma mimicking pancreatic cancer: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Jae Hyung Kim; Woo Hyun Paik; Mee Joo; Jung Gon Kim; Jong Wook Kim; Won Ki Bae; Nam-Hoon Kim; Kyung-Ah Kim; June Sung Lee
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

9.  22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses.

Authors:  William Sterlacci; Athanasios D Sioulas; Lothar Veits; Pervin Gönüllü; Guido Schachschal; Stefan Groth; Mario Anders; Christos K Kontos; Theodoros Topalidis; Andrea Hinsch; Michael Vieth; Thomas Rösch; Ulrike W Denzer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.

Authors:  A Aziz Aadam; Sachin Wani; Ashley Amick; Janak N Shah; Yasser M Bhat; Christopher M Hamerski; Jason B Klapman; V Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra R Watson; Alfred W Rademaker; Rajesh N Keswani; Laurie Keefer; Ananya Das; Srinadh Komanduri
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.