Literature DB >> 29600181

Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis.

Dong Hui Lim1,2, Eui-Sang Chung1, Myoung Joon Kim3, Tae-Young Chung1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess visual quality after presbyopia correction using an aspheric ablation profile and a micro-monovision protocol.
METHODS: This is a retrospective interventional study. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients (mean age, 50.2±7.5y) who underwent presbyopia correction with an aspheric micro-monovision protocol were enrolled. The values of modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, objective scattering index (OSI) and accommodation range were quantitatively assessed using the HD analyzer. Preoperative and postoperative contrast sensitivity (CS) at far (2.5 m) and near (40 cm) distance and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were analyzed. Subjective visual satisfaction was evaluated by self-reported questionnaire regarding optical visual symptoms.
RESULTS: One year after presbyopia correction, no significant differences were found in the MTF cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio and OSI, however, the HD analyzer accommodation range significantly differed postoperatively (P=0.004). Postoperative CS at 12 and 18 cpd at near showed statistically significant improvement (P=0.020 and 0.008, respectively). Visual performance by self-reported questionnaire revealed satisfactory results in terms of subjective visual quality improvement.
CONCLUSION: Objective optical quality parameters show good visual outcomes. Subjective visual quality assessed by self-reported questionnaire in the presbyopia correction group show satisfactory results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LASIK; laser blended vision; presbyopia correction; visual quality

Year:  2018        PMID: 29600181      PMCID: PMC5861237          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  33 in total

1.  Optical Quality Analysis System; Instrument for objective clinical evaluation of ocular optical quality.

Authors:  José L Güell; Jaume Pujol; Montserrat Arjona; Fernando Diaz-Douton; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Repeatability of measurements with a double-pass system.

Authors:  Alain Saad; Marc Saab; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Patricia Schimchak; Robert Montés-Micó; Ahmed Galal
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye. Changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus.

Authors:  J F Koretz; C A Cook; P L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.

Authors:  Myoung Joon Kim; Len Zheleznyak; Scott Macrae; Hungwon Tchah; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Aspheric wavefront-guided LASIK to treat hyperopic presbyopia: 12-month results with the VISX platform.

Authors:  W Bruce Jackson; Kuang-Mon Ashley Tuan; George Mintsioulis
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  PresbyLASIK approach for the correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Sophia I Panagopoulou
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Optical quality one month after verisyse and Veriflex phakic IOL implantation and Zeiss MEL 80 LASIK for myopia from 5.00 to 16.50 diopters.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Adenay Padilla; Jaume Pujol; Juan C Ondategui; Pablo Artal; Jose L Güell
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform.

Authors:  Roberto Pinelli; Dolores Ortiz; Anna Simonetto; Cristian Bacchi; Esperanza Sala; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Reading performance and patient satisfaction after corneal inlay implantation for presbyopia correction: two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alois K Dexl; Orang Seyeddain; Wolfgang Riha; Theresa Rückl; Alexander Bachernegg; Martin Emesz; Josef Ruckhofer; Günther Grabner
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  2 in total

1.  Refractive outcomes and optical quality of PRESBYOND laser-blended vision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Dan Fu; Aruma Aruma; Ye Xu; Tian Han; Fei Xia; Xing-Tao Zhou
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Visian® ICLV4c™ and Artiflex®: Comparative Analysis with the HD AnalyserTM and Integration with Subjective Performance and Anatomical Parameters.

Authors:  Pedro Manuel Baptista; Sílvia Monteiro; Ana Carolina Abreu; João Poças; Diana José; Miguel Lume; Maria do Céu Pinto
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.