Literature DB >> 22921231

Reading performance and patient satisfaction after corneal inlay implantation for presbyopia correction: two-year follow-up.

Alois K Dexl1, Orang Seyeddain, Wolfgang Riha, Theresa Rückl, Alexander Bachernegg, Martin Emesz, Josef Ruckhofer, Günther Grabner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate change in reading performance parameters after monocular Kamra corneal inlay implantation for the surgical correction of presbyopia.
SETTING: University surgical outpatient center.
DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series.
METHODS: A corneal inlay was implanted in the nondominant eye. Naturally emmetropic and presbyopic patients between 45 years and 60 years old with an uncorrected distance visual acuity of at least 20/20 in both eyes without additional ocular pathology were eligible for inclusion. Bilateral uncorrected reading acuity, reading distance, mean and maximum reading speed, and the smallest log-scaled print size (lower case letter of a Radner reading chart) were evaluated using the Salzburg Reading Desk. The minimum postoperative follow-up was 24 months.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The mean reading distance was 46.7 cm ± 6.3 (SD) preoperatively and 39.5 ± 6.4 cm 24 months postoperatively (P<.001). The mean reading acuity at best distance improved (0.33 ± 0.13 logRAD versus 0.23 ± 0.11 logRAD) (P=.004). The mean reading speed increased from 141 ± 20 words per minute (wpm) to 146 ± 20 wpm, respectively (P=.261), and the mean maximum reading speed from 171 ± 28 wpm to 180 ± 22 wpm, respectively (P=.110). The smallest print size improved from 1.50 ± 0.42 mm to 1.01 ± 0.22 mm, respectively (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Improving the depth of focus by monocular implantation of a small-aperture optic caused statistically significant changes in all tested reading performance parameters except reading speed metrics in emmetropic presbyopic patients.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921231     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  10 in total

1.  Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Dong Hui Lim; Eui-Sang Chung; Myoung Joon Kim; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Small-aperture intracorneal inlay implantation in emmetropic presbyopic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Inés Pluma-Jaramago; Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada; Rahul Rachwani-Anil; José-María Sánchez-González
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Comparison of binocular through-focus visual acuity with monovision and a small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Christina Schwarz; Silvestre Manzanera; Pedro M Prieto; Enrique J Fernández; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Clinical utility of the KAMRA corneal inlay.

Authors:  Shehzad Anjam Naroo; Paramdeep Singh Bilkhu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-18

5.  Six-month visual outcomes for the correction of presbyopia using a small-aperture corneal inlay: single-site experience.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Tyler S Quist; David F Skanchy; Ryan T Wallace; Steven H Linn; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-02

6.  Cataract Surgery in Patients with a Previous History of KAMRA Inlay Implantation: A Case Series.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Tyler S Quist; David F Skanchy; Steven H Linn; Jordan Desautels; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-04-25

7.  Small-aperture intraocular lens tolerance to induced astigmatism.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ang
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-04

8.  Functional Outcomes and Reading Speeds following PRESBYOND LBV Using Nonlinear Aspheric Ablation Profiles Combined with Micro-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Smith Snehal Sute; Sheetal N Bagare; Sri Ganesh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 9.  Presbyopic correction on the cornea.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13

10.  Vignetting and field of view with the KAMRA corneal inlay.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Susanne Goebels; Nóra Szentmáry; Berthold Seitz; Timo Eppig
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.