Literature DB >> 29590606

A Nonquiescent "Idling" Population State in Drug-Treated, BRAF-Mutated Melanoma.

B Bishal Paudel1, Leonard A Harris2, Keisha N Hardeman2, Arwa A Abugable3, Corey E Hayford4, Darren R Tyson2, Vito Quaranta5.   

Abstract

Targeted therapy is an effective standard of care in BRAF-mutated malignant melanoma. However, the duration of tumor remission varies unpredictably among patients, and relapse is almost inevitable. Here, we examine the responses of several BRAF-mutated melanoma cell lines (including isogenic subclones) to BRAF inhibitors. We observe complex response dynamics across cell lines, with short-term responses (<100 h) varying from cell line to cell line. In the long term, however, we observe equilibration of all drug-treated populations into a nonquiescent state characterized by a balanced rate of death and division, which we term the "idling" state, and to our knowledge, this state has not been previously reported. Using mathematical modeling, we propose that the observed population-level dynamics are the result of cells transitioning between basins of attraction within a drug-modified phenotypic landscape. Each basin is associated with a drug-induced proliferation rate, a recently introduced metric of an antiproliferative drug effect. The idling population state represents a new dynamic equilibrium in which cells are distributed across the landscape such that the population achieves zero net growth. By fitting our model to experimental drug-response data, we infer the phenotypic landscapes of all considered melanoma cell lines and provide a unifying view of how BRAF-mutated melanomas respond to BRAF inhibition. We hypothesize that the residual disease observed in patients after targeted therapy is composed of a significant number of idling cells. Thus, defining molecular determinants of the phenotypic landscape that idling populations occupy may lead to "targeted landscaping" therapies based on rational modification of the landscape to favor basins with greater drug susceptibility.
Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29590606      PMCID: PMC5883941          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  71 in total

Review 1.  Persistence: mechanisms for triggering and enhancing phenotypic variability.

Authors:  N Q Balaban
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Joseph X Zhou; Sui Huang
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Non-genomic and Immune Evolution of Melanoma Acquiring MAPKi Resistance.

Authors:  Willy Hugo; Hubing Shi; Lu Sun; Marco Piva; Chunying Song; Xiangju Kong; Gatien Moriceau; Aayoung Hong; Kimberly B Dahlman; Douglas B Johnson; Jeffrey A Sosman; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy.

Authors:  S C Mack; H Witt; R M Piro; L Gu; S Zuyderduyn; A M Stütz; X Wang; M Gallo; L Garzia; K Zayne; X Zhang; V Ramaswamy; N Jäger; D T W Jones; M Sill; T J Pugh; M Ryzhova; K M Wani; D J H Shih; R Head; M Remke; S D Bailey; T Zichner; C C Faria; M Barszczyk; S Stark; H Seker-Cin; S Hutter; P Johann; S Bender; V Hovestadt; T Tzaridis; A M Dubuc; P A Northcott; J Peacock; K C Bertrand; S Agnihotri; F M G Cavalli; I Clarke; K Nethery-Brokx; C L Creasy; S K Verma; J Koster; X Wu; Y Yao; T Milde; P Sin-Chan; J Zuccaro; L Lau; S Pereira; P Castelo-Branco; M Hirst; M A Marra; S S Roberts; D Fults; L Massimi; Y J Cho; T Van Meter; W Grajkowska; B Lach; A E Kulozik; A von Deimling; O Witt; S W Scherer; X Fan; K M Muraszko; M Kool; S L Pomeroy; N Gupta; J Phillips; A Huang; U Tabori; C Hawkins; D Malkin; P N Kongkham; W A Weiss; N Jabado; J T Rutka; E Bouffet; J O Korbel; M Lupien; K D Aldape; G D Bader; R Eils; P Lichter; P B Dirks; S M Pfister; A Korshunov; M D Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution.

Authors:  Mark Shackleton; Elsa Quintana; Eric R Fearon; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Caitriona Holohan; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Daniel B Longley; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Real-time cell cycle imaging during melanoma growth, invasion, and drug response.

Authors:  Nikolas K Haass; Kimberley A Beaumont; David S Hill; Andrea Anfosso; Paulus Mrass; Marcia A Munoz; Ichiko Kinjyo; Wolfgang Weninger
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.693

9.  Tumor cells can follow distinct evolutionary paths to become resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition.

Authors:  Aaron N Hata; Matthew J Niederst; Hannah L Archibald; Maria Gomez-Caraballo; Faria M Siddiqui; Hillary E Mulvey; Yosef E Maruvka; Fei Ji; Hyo-eun C Bhang; Viveksagar Krishnamurthy Radhakrishna; Giulia Siravegna; Haichuan Hu; Sana Raoof; Elizabeth Lockerman; Anuj Kalsy; Dana Lee; Celina L Keating; David A Ruddy; Leah J Damon; Adam S Crystal; Carlotta Costa; Zofia Piotrowska; Alberto Bardelli; Anthony J Iafrate; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Frank Stegmeier; Gad Getz; Lecia V Sequist; Anthony C Faber; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Cancer drug addiction is relayed by an ERK2-dependent phenotype switch.

Authors:  Xiangjun Kong; Thomas Kuilman; Aida Shahrabi; Julia Boshuizen; Kristel Kemper; Ji-Ying Song; Hans W M Niessen; Elisa A Rozeman; Marnix H Geukes Foppen; Christian U Blank; Daniel S Peeper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Metabolic plasticity meets gene regulation.

Authors:  B Bishal Paudel; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling heterogeneous tumor growth dynamics and cell-cell interactions at single-cell and cell-population resolution.

Authors:  Leonard A Harris; Samantha Beik; Patricia M M Ozawa; Lizandra Jimenez; Alissa M Weaver
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-09-16

3.  Quantifying Drug Combination Synergy along Potency and Efficacy Axes.

Authors:  Christian T Meyer; David J Wooten; B Bishal Paudel; Joshua Bauer; Keisha N Hardeman; David Westover; Christine M Lovly; Leonard A Harris; Darren R Tyson; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  An in vitro model of tumor heterogeneity resolves genetic, epigenetic, and stochastic sources of cell state variability.

Authors:  Corey E Hayford; Darren R Tyson; C Jack Robbins; Peter L Frick; Vito Quaranta; Leonard A Harris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Receptor-Driven ERK Pulses Reconfigure MAPK Signaling and Enable Persistence of Drug-Adapted BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Luca Gerosa; Christopher Chidley; Fabian Fröhlich; Gabriela Sanchez; Sang Kyun Lim; Jeremy Muhlich; Jia-Yun Chen; Sreeram Vallabhaneni; Gregory J Baker; Denis Schapiro; Mariya I Atanasova; Lily A Chylek; Tujin Shi; Lian Yi; Carrie D Nicora; Allison Claas; Thomas S C Ng; Rainer H Kohler; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Ralph Weissleder; Miles A Miller; Wei-Jun Qian; H Steven Wiley; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  An Integrative Analysis of The Micro-RNAs Contributing in Stemness, Metastasis and B-Raf Pathways in Malignant Melanoma and Melanoma Stem Cell.

Authors:  Parisa Sahranavardfard; Zahra Madjd; Amir Nader Emami Razavi; Ali Reza Ghanadan; Javad Firouzi; Pardis Khosravani; Saeid Ghavami; Esmaeil Ebrahimie; Marzieh Ebrahimi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Modelling bistable tumour population dynamics to design effective treatment strategies.

Authors:  Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Jong Wook Kim; Ryan Sullivan; Robert A Beckman; Pablo Tamayo; Chen-Hsiang Yeang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 8.  Emerging roles of H3K9me3, SETDB1 and SETDB2 in therapy-induced cellular reprogramming.

Authors:  Joachim Torrano; Abdullah Al Emran; Heinz Hammerlindl; Helmut Schaider
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 6.551

9.  A mechanistic modeling framework reveals the key principles underlying tumor metabolism.

Authors:  Shubham Tripathi; Jun Hyoung Park; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Herbert Levine
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.