Literature DB >> 29585974

Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social Interactions.

Jason B Wolf, Edmund D Brodie Iii, Allen J Moore.   

Abstract

Social interactions often affect the fitness of interactants. Because of this, social selection has been described as a process distinct from other forms of natural selection. Social selection has been predicted to result in different evolutionary dynamics for interacting phenotypes, including rapid or extreme evolution and evolution of altruism. Despite the critical role that social selection plays in theories of social evolution, few studies have measured the force of social selection or the conditions under which this force changes. Here we present a model of social selection acting on interacting phenotypes that can be evaluated independently from the genetics of interacting phenotypes. Our model of social selection is analogous to covariance models of other forms of selection. We observe that an opportunity for social selection exists whenever individual fitness varies as a result of interactions with conspecifics. Social selection occurs, therefore, when variation in fitness due to interactions covaries with traits, resulting in a net force of selection acting on the interacting phenotypes. Thus, there must be a covariance between the phenotypes of the interactants for social selection to exist. This interacting phenotype covariance is important because it measures the degree to which a particular trait covaries with the selective environment provided by conspecifics. A variety of factors, including nonrandom interactions, behavioral modification during interactions, relatedness, and indirect genetic effects may contribute to the covariance of interacting phenotypes, which promotes social selection. The independent force of social selection (measured as a social selection gradient) can be partitioned empirically from the force of natural selection (measured by the natural selection gradient) using partial regression. This measure can be combined with genetic models of interacting phenotypes to provide insights into social evolution.

Keywords:  Hamilton's rule; indirect genetic effects; kin selection; quantitative genetics; social selection

Year:  1999        PMID: 29585974     DOI: 10.1086/303168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  42 in total

1.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Montgomerie; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Dynamic network partnerships and social contagion drive cooperation.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; T Brandt Ryder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Habitat choice meets thermal specialization: Competition with specialists may drive suboptimal habitat preferences in generalists.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Estelle Laurent; Bart Haegeman; Romain Bertrand; Jérôme G Prunier; Delphine Legrand; Julien Cote; Alexis S Chaine; Michel Loreau; Jean Clobert; Nicolas Schtickzelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The gene's eye view, the Gouldian knot, Fisherian swords and the causes of selection.

Authors:  David C Queller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Living Slow and Being Moral : Life History Predicts the Dual Process of Other-Centered Reasoning and Judgments.

Authors:  Nan Zhu; Skyler T Hawk; Lei Chang
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-06

10.  A genetic polymorphism affecting reliance on personal versus public information in a spatial learning task in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julien Foucaud; Anne-Sophie Philippe; Celine Moreno; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.