Literature DB >> 23576793

A genetic polymorphism affecting reliance on personal versus public information in a spatial learning task in Drosophila melanogaster.

Julien Foucaud1, Anne-Sophie Philippe, Celine Moreno, Frederic Mery.   

Abstract

Organisms that face behavioural challenges can use different types of information to guide their decisions. First, they can use the personal information they sample in their environment. Second, they can use the inadvertent social information provided by the behaviour of conspecifics or heterospecifics (i.e. public information). Currently, little is known about the interaction between genetic variation and the use of personal versus public information in natural populations. Here, we investigated whether a natural genetic polymorphism affects the use of personal versus public information in a spatial learning task in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that genetic variation at the foraging locus interacts with social context during spatial learning. While both allelic variants are able to use personal and public information to improve their navigation during 10 training trials, a probe trial revealed that individuals carrying the for(R) (rover) allele rely mainly on personal information, whereas individuals carrying the for(s) (sitter) allele either use or display more public information than rovers. Accordingly, transfer of social information is more important in groups of sitters than in groups of rovers. These results suggest that a positive feedback loop can occur between alleles promoting group living, such as for(s), and the use and/or display of public information, ultimately providing the opportunity for the joint evolution of sociality and cultural traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23576793      PMCID: PMC3652466          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  40 in total

Review 1.  Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic dissociation of acquisition and memory strength in the heat-box spatial learning paradigm in Drosophila.

Authors:  Soeren Diegelmann; Melissa Zars; Troy Zars
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Sasha R X Dall; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Ola Olsson; John M McNamara; David W Stephens
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation.

Authors:  Andrew M Simons
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene.

Authors:  Mark J Fitzpatrick; Elah Feder; Locke Rowe; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Natural polymorphism affecting learning and memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Frederic Mery; Amsale T Belay; Anthony K-C So; Marla B Sokolowski; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  cGMP-dependent changes in phototaxis: a possible role for the foraging gene in honey bee division of labor.

Authors:  Y Ben-Shahar; H-T Leung; W L Pak; M B Sokolowski; G E Robinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior.

Authors:  Amy L Toth; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Drosophila foraging gene human orthologue PRKG1 predicts individual differences in the effects of early adversity on maternal sensitivity.

Authors:  H Moriah Sokolowski; Oscar E Vasquez; Eva Unternaehrer; Dustin J Sokolowski; Stephanie D Biergans; Leslie Atkinson; Andrea Gonzalez; Patricia P Silveira; Robert Levitan; Kieran J O'Donnell; Meir Steiner; James Kennedy; Michael J Meaney; Alison S Fleming; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2016-12-28

2.  Multiple genetic loci affect place learning and memory performance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricka A Williams-Simon; Christopher Posey; Samuel Mitchell; Enoch Ng'oma; James A Mrkvicka; Troy Zars; Elizabeth G King
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Introduced Drosophila subobscura populations perform better than native populations during an oviposition choice task due to increased fecundity but similar learning ability.

Authors:  Julien Foucaud; Céline Moreno; Marta Pascual; Enrico L Rezende; Luis E Castañeda; Patricia Gibert; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use.

Authors:  Stuart K Watson; Gillian L Vale; Lydia M Hopper; Lewis G Dean; Rachel L Kendal; Elizabeth E Price; Lara A Wood; Sarah J Davis; Steven J Schapiro; Susan P Lambeth; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Opposite valence social information provided by bio-robotic demonstrators shapes selection processes in the green bottle fly.

Authors:  Donato Romano; Giovanni Benelli; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Dynamics of social behavior in fruit fly larvae.

Authors:  Zachary Durisko; Rebecca Kemp; Rameeshay Mubasher; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social environment influences performance in a cognitive task in natural variants of the foraging gene.

Authors:  Nancy R Kohn; Christopher J Reaume; Celine Moreno; James G Burns; Marla B Sokolowski; Frederic Mery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Commentary: Do Bees Play the Producer-Scrounger Game?

Authors:  Mathieu Lihoreau; Cristian Pasquaretta; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-07

9.  Quantitative genetics of the use of conspecific and heterospecific social cues for breeding site choice.

Authors:  Jere Tolvanen; Sami M Kivelä; Blandine Doligez; Jennifer Morinay; Lars Gustafsson; Piter Bijma; Veli-Matti Pakanen; Jukka T Forsman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Expression of the foraging gene in adult Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aaron M Allen; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 1.250

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.