Literature DB >> 24068359

Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Julia B Saltz1.   

Abstract

Indirect genetic effects (IGEs) describe how an individual's behaviour-which is influenced by his or her genotype-can affect the behaviours of interacting individuals. IGE research has focused on dyads. However, insights from social networks research, and other studies of group behaviour, suggest that dyadic interactions are affected by the behaviour of other individuals in the group. To extend IGE inferences to groups of three or more, IGEs must be considered from a group perspective. Here, I introduce the 'focal interaction' approach to study IGEs in groups. I illustrate the utility of this approach by studying aggression among natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. I chose two natural genotypes as 'focal interactants': the behavioural interaction between them was the 'focal interaction'. One male from each focal interactant genotype was present in every group, and I varied the genotype of the third male-the 'treatment male'. Genetic variation in the treatment male's aggressive behaviour influenced the focal interaction, demonstrating that IGEs in groups are not a straightforward extension of IGEs measured in dyads. Further, the focal interaction influenced male mating success, illustrating the role of IGEs in behavioural evolution. These results represent the first manipulative evidence for IGEs at the group level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IGEs; aggression; fruitfly (Drosophila melanogaster); sexual selection; social behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068359      PMCID: PMC3790486          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  41 in total

1.  Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: reasons, recommendations, and reality.

Authors:  D Wahlsten
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-08

2.  Social insect networks.

Authors:  Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.

Authors:  Allen J Moore; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Multilevel selection 1: Quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; William M Muir; Johan A M Van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates.

Authors:  Jessica C Flack; Michelle Girvan; Frans B M de Waal; David C Krakauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust.

Authors:  Donald L Ferrin; Kurt T Dirks; Pri P Shah
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-07

8.  Molecular analysis of flies selected for aggressive behavior.

Authors:  Herman A Dierick; Ralph J Greenspan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Gender-selective patterns of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steven P Nilsen; Yick-Bun Chan; Robert Huber; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantitative genomics of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexis C Edwards; Stephanie M Rollmann; Theodore J Morgan; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  16 in total

1.  Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Authors:  Emily S Martin; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Social network dynamics precede a mass eviction in group-living rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Sam M Larson; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Michael L Platt; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  A Bayesian Approach to Social Structure Uncovers Cryptic Regulation of Group Dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Julia B Saltz; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Paul Marjoram
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Honey bee colony aggression and indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic variation in social environment construction influences the development of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J B Saltz
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Interpreting Behavior Genetic Models: Seven Developmental Processes to Understand.

Authors:  Daniel A Briley; Jonathan Livengood; Jaime Derringer; Elliot M Tucker-Drob; R Chris Fraley; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Behavioral effects of social challenges and genomic mechanisms of social priming: What's testosterone got to do with it?

Authors:  Kimberly A Rosvall; Mark P Peterson
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Cascading indirect genetic effects in a clonal vertebrate.

Authors:  Amber M Makowicz; David Bierbach; Christian Richardson; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Genotype-by-genotype epistasis for exploratory behaviour in D. simulans.

Authors:  Allison Jaffe; Madeline P Burns; Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Genomic tools for behavioural ecologists to understand repeatable individual differences in behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah E Bengston; Romain A Dahan; Zoe Donaldson; Steven M Phelps; Kees van Oers; Andrew Sih; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 19.100

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.