Literature DB >> 22777016

The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.

Joseph A Tobias1, Robert Montgomerie, Bruce E Lyon.   

Abstract

Ornaments, weapons and aggressive behaviours may evolve in female animals by mate choice and intrasexual competition for mating opportunities-the standard forms of sexual selection in males. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that selection tends to operate in different ways in males and females, with female traits more often mediating competition for ecological resources, rather than mate acquisition. Two main solutions have been proposed to accommodate this disparity. One is to expand the concept of sexual selection to include all mechanisms related to fecundity; another is to adopt an alternative conceptual framework-the theory of social selection-in which sexual selection is one component of a more general form of selection resulting from all social interactions. In this study, we summarize the history of the debate about female ornaments and weapons, and discuss potential resolutions. We review the components of fitness driving ornamentation in a wide range of systems, and show that selection often falls outside the limits of traditional sexual selection theory, particularly in females. We conclude that the evolution of these traits in both sexes is best understood within the unifying framework of social selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777016      PMCID: PMC3391421          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  77 in total

1.  Why are female birds ornamented?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Experimental evidence for mutual inter- and intrasexual selection favouring a crested auklet ornament.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  R H Baker; G S Wilkinson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

5.  Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish.

Authors:  T Amundsen; E Forsgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Visual mate choice in poison frogs.

Authors:  K Summers; R Symula; M Clough; T Cronin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The role of colour in signalling and male choice in the agamid lizard Ctenophorus ornatus.

Authors:  N R LeBas; N J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Shield characteristics are testosterone-dependent in both male and female moorhens.

Authors:  M Eens; E Van Duyse; L Berghman; R Pinxten
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird.

Authors:  S A Saether; P Fiske; J A Kålås
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  76 in total

1.  Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Family feuds: social competition and sexual conflict in complex societies.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The sexual selection paradigm: have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments?

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Iina Tukiainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Andrew T Kahn; Karoline Fritzsche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration.

Authors:  James Dale; Cody J Dey; Kaspar Delhey; Bart Kempenaers; Mihai Valcu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The fractal dimension of a conspicuous ornament varies with mating status and shows assortative mating in wild red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa).

Authors:  Alejandro Cantarero; Jesús Carrasco Naranjo; Fabián Casas; Francois Mougeot; Javier Viñuela; Carlos Alonso-Alvarez
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-06-29

8.  Reproductive skew drives patterns of sexual dimorphism in sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps.

Authors:  Solomon Tin Chi Chak; J Emmett Duffy; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers.

Authors:  Richard K Simpson; Michele A Johnson; Troy G Murphy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evolution of displays within the pair bond.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Trevor D Price; Russell Lande
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.