| Literature DB >> 29581838 |
Tomoaki Terakawa1,2, Eriko Katsuta3, Li Yan4, Nitesh Turaga4, Kerry-Ann McDonald3, Masato Fujisawa2, Khurshid A Guru1, Kazuaki Takabe3,5,6,7,8.
Abstract
Solute carrier organic anion (SLCO) gene families encode organic anion transport proteins, which are transporters that up-take a number of substrates including androgens. Among them, high expression of SLCO2B1 is known to associate with the resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer (PCa). We hypothesized that high expression of SLCO genes enhances PCa progression by promoting the influx of androgen. Here, we demonstrated the impact of the expression levels of SLCO2B1 on prognosis in localized PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP) utilizing 494 PCa cases in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). SLCO2B1 high expression group showed significantly worse Disease-free survival (DFS) after RP (p = 0.001). The expression level of SLCO2B1 was significantly higher in advanced characteristics including Gleason Score (GS ≤ 6 vs GS = 7; p = 0.047, GS = 7 vs GS ≥ 8; p = 0.002), pathological primary tumor (pT2 vs pT3/4; p < 0.001), and surgical margin status (positive vs negative; p = 0.013), respectively. There was a significant difference in DFS between these two groups only in GS ≥ 8 patients (p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only SLCO2B1 expression level was an independent predictor for DFS after RP in GS ≥ 8. SLCO2B1 high expressed tumors in GS ≥ 8 not only enriched epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) related gene set, (p = 0.027), as well as Hedgehog (p < 0.001), IL-6/JAK/STAT3 (p < 0.001), and K-ras signaling gene sets (p < 0.001), which are known to promote EMT, but also showed higher expression of EMT related genes, including N-cadherin (p = 0.024), SNAIL (p = 0.001), SLUG (p = 0.001), ZEB-1 (p < 0.001) and Vimentin (p < 0.001). In conclusion, PCa with high expression of SLCO2B1 demonstrated worse DFS, which might be due to accelerated EMT.Entities:
Keywords: EMT; OATP; SLCO2B1; prostate cancer; recurrence
Year: 2018 PMID: 29581838 PMCID: PMC5865664 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Demographics and PCa characteristics
| Patients ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (y.o.)† | 61.0 ± 6.8 |
| GS (%) | |
| ≤6 | 44 (8.9%) |
| 7 | 246 (49.8%) |
| ≥8 | 204 (41.3%) |
| Pathological Primary tumor: pT (%) | |
| pT2 | 185 (37.4%) |
| pT3a | 158 (32.0%) |
| pT3b | 135 (27.3%) |
| pT4 | 10 (20.2%) |
| Regional Lymph Node: | |
| N0 | 343 (69.4%) |
| N1 | 79 (16.0%) |
| Surgical margin status (%) | |
| negative | 313 (63.4%) |
| positive | 152 (30.8%) |
| Adjuvant radiation therapy (%) | |
| no | 246 (49.8%) |
| yes | 40 (8.1%) |
†: mean ± SD
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival in TCGA PCa patients
DFS (A) and OS (B) in whole TCGA PCa patients. DFS (C) and OS (D) classified by GS in whole TCGA PCa patients. Red line; GS ≤ 6, green line; GS = 7, blue line GS ≥ 8.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier estimate of disease-free and overall survival by dichotomized of SLCO2B1 and SLCO1B3 expression in TCGA PCa patients
(A, B) Classified by SLCO2B1 expression level, (C, D) classified by SLCO1B3 expression level. Red line; high expression, blue line; low expression of each genes.
Figure 3The expression level of SLCO2B1 according to pathological factors in TCGA PCa patients
(A) GS. (B) pathological primary tumor status (pT). (C) surgical margin status.
Figure 4DFS classified by SLCO2B1 expression level in the subgroups according to GS in TCGA PCa patients
(A) GS ≤ 6, (B) GS = 7, (C) GS ≥ 8. Red line; high expression, blue line; low expression of SLCO2B1.
Clinicopathological characteristics of SLCO2B1 high and low in the PCa patients with GS ≥ 8
| High | Low | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y.o.)† | 62.2 ± 5.6 | 62.6 ± 7.3 | 0.666 |
| Pathological Primary tumor: pT | 0.309 | ||
| pT2 | 11 | 17 | |
| pT3a | 25 | 37 | |
| pT3b | 60 | 45 | |
| pT4 | 5 | 2 | |
| Regional Lymph Node: N | 0.648 | ||
| N0 | 64 | 63 | |
| N1 | 30 | 35 | |
| Surgical Margin | 0.564 | ||
| negative | 45 | 48 | |
| positive | 53 | 46 | |
| Adjuvant RT | 0.570 | ||
| no | 50 | 61 | |
| yes | 19 | 18 |
†: mean ± SD.
Univariate and multivariate analyses for independent DFS predictor of PCa patients with GS ≥ 8
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinicopathological factor | HR | (95% CI) | HR | (95% CI) | ||
| Age (>70 vs <70) | 0.884 | (0.352−2.217) | 0.792 | |||
| pT (pT3,4 vs pT2) | 2.518 | (1.007−6.299) | 0.048* | 2.223 | (0.867−5.679) | 0.096 |
| N (N1 vs N0) | 0.852 | (0.495−1.468) | 0.564 | |||
| Surgical margin (positive vs negative) | 1.750 | (1.057−2.896) | 0.030* | 1.607 | (0.96−2.692) | 0.071 |
| Adjuvant Radiation (yes vs no) | 1.038 | (0.55−1.959) | 0.909 | |||
| SLCO2B1 (High vs Low) | 1.991 | (1.204−3.294) | 0.007* | 1.829 | (1.093−3.061) | 0.022* |
*:p < 0.05.
Figure 5GSEA between SLCO2B1 high and low expression in patients with GS ≥ 8
Figure 6EMT related genes expression comparison between SLCO2B1 high and low in patients with GS ≥ 8