BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis, we evaluated associations between statins and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following treatment of localized prostate cancer, with attention to potential benefits among patients treated primarily with radiotherapy (RT) versus radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified original studies examining the effect of statins on men who received definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer using a systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through August 2012. Our search yielded 17 eligible studies from 794 references; 13 studies with hazard ratios (HRs) for RFS were included in the formal meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, statins did not affect RFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.08). However, in RT patients (six studies), statins were associated with a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.93); this benefit was not observed in radical prostatectomy patients (seven studies). Sensitivity analyses suggested that primary treatment modality may impact the effect of statins on prostate cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests a potentially beneficial effect of statins on prostate cancer patients treated with RT but not among radical prostatectomy patients. Although limited by the lack of randomized data, these results suggest that primary treatment modality should be considered in future studies examining associations between statins and oncologic outcomes.
BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis, we evaluated associations between statins and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following treatment of localized prostate cancer, with attention to potential benefits among patients treated primarily with radiotherapy (RT) versus radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified original studies examining the effect of statins on men who received definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer using a systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through August 2012. Our search yielded 17 eligible studies from 794 references; 13 studies with hazard ratios (HRs) for RFS were included in the formal meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, statins did not affect RFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.08). However, in RT patients (six studies), statins were associated with a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.93); this benefit was not observed in radical prostatectomy patients (seven studies). Sensitivity analyses suggested that primary treatment modality may impact the effect of statins on prostate cancer recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests a potentially beneficial effect of statins on prostate cancerpatients treated with RT but not among radical prostatectomy patients. Although limited by the lack of randomized data, these results suggest that primary treatment modality should be considered in future studies examining associations between statins and oncologic outcomes.
Authors: Robert J Hamilton; Lionel L Banez; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Elizabeth A Platz; Christopher J Kane; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Abhishek Kumar; Paul Riviere; Elaine Luterstein; Vinit Nalawade; Lucas Vitzthum; Reith R Sarkar; Alex K Bryant; John P Einck; Arno J Mundt; James D Murphy; Brent S Rose Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: M R Danzig; S Kotamarti; R A Ghandour; M B Rothberg; B P Dubow; M C Benson; K K Badani; J M McKiernan Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: June M Chan; Stacey A Kenfield; Alan Paciorek; Elizabeth A Platz; Edward L Giovannucci; Meir J Stampfer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-07-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Emma H Allott; Lauren E Howard; Matthew R Cooperberg; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 5.588