Literature DB >> 11912386

Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone.

Badar M Mian1, Patricia Troncoso, Koji Okihara, Viju Bhadkamkar, Dennis Johnston, Adriana O Reyes, R Joseph Babaian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determine the effect of clinical and pathological variables on the outcome of patients with prostate cancer of Gleason scores 8 or greater treated with radical prostatectomy alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1987 and October 1998, 1,199 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. We identified 188 patients assigned a Gleason score of 8 or higher in the prostatectomy specimen who did not receive any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Median followup was 60 months (range 1 to 129). Disease recurrence was defined as any detectable prostate specific antigen level 0.1 ng./ml. or greater.
RESULTS: Of 188 patients 128 (68%) had no evidence of prostate cancer after a median followup of 60 months, while 60 (32%) demonstrated a detectable PSA level. There were 58 (31%) patients with disease confined to the prostate with negative surgical margins while 108 (57%) had prostate cancer confined to the surgical specimen. Positive surgical margin with extraprostatic extension was seen in 16 (9%) patients and seminal vesicle invasion was present in 40 (21%). The 5 and 7-year disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 71% and 55%, respectively. Patients with specimen confined disease had a significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival rate than those with nonspecimen confined disease (84% and 50%, p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis pathological status of the surgical specimen was the most significant independent predictor of disease recurrence. Age, ethnicity, clinical stage and preoperative PSA had no independent effect on disease recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term disease-free survival can be expected in those patients with high grade prostate cancer whose disease is confined to the prostate and/or the surgical specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gregor Mikuz; Rafael J Luque; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Postoperative biochemical recurrence of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Authors:  Ji Eun Heo; Jee Soo Park; Jong Soo Lee; Jongchan Kim; Won Sik Jang; Nam Hoon Cho; Koon Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Won Sik Ham
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading.

Authors:  John F Donohue; Fernando J Bianco; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Andrew J Vickers; Thomas M Wheeler; Peter T Scardino; Victor A Reuter; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Richard Flavin; Masis Isikbay; Jennifer R Rider; Travis A Gerke; Stephen Finn; Andreas Pettersson; Francesca Giunchi; Robert H Unger; Alex M Tinianow; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Radical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high-risk group: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Motonobu Nakamura; Ken Hishikawa; Atsushi Fukuda; Takashi Matsumoto; Kenichi Nishiyama; Takeharu Yamanaka; Yoshihiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-15

6.  Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.

Authors:  Wan Song; Dong Hyeon Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Jong Wook Kim; SangChul Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Jin Seon Cho; Hanjong Ahn; Seong Soo Jeon
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bulent Akduman; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

8.  African-american race is a predictor of seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kosj Yamoah; Amy Walker; Elaine Spangler; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Bruce Malkowicz; David I Lee; Adam P Dicker; Timothy R Rebbeck; Priti Lal
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Addressing the needs of the high-risk prostate cancer patient.

Authors:  Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

10.  Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy for Gleason 8-10 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Naveen Pokala; Jerry J Trulson; Majdee Islam
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.