Literature DB >> 31489304

International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Rong Liu1, Go Wakabayashi2, Chinnusamy Palanivelu3, Allan Tsung4, Kehu Yang5, Brian K P Goh6, Charing Ching-Ning Chong7, Chang Moo Kang8, Chenghong Peng9, Eli Kakiashvili10, Ho-Seong Han11, Hong-Jin Kim12, Jin He13, Jae Hoon Lee14, Kyoichi Takaori15, Marco Vito Marino16, Shen-Nien Wang17, Tiankang Guo18, Thilo Hackert19, Ting-Shuo Huang20, Yiengpruksawan Anusak21, Yuman Fong22, Yuichi Nagakawa23, Yi-Ming Shyr24, Yao-Ming Wu25, Yupei Zhao26.   

Abstract

The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic pancreatic surgery and put forth experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group* and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 19 topics were analyzed. The first 16 recommendations were generated by GRADE using an evidence-based method (EBM) and focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques, certification of the robotic surgeon, and cost-effectiveness of robotic pancreatic surgery. The remaining three recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion due to insufficient EBM results. Since the current amount of evidence was low/meager as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; consensus statement; pancreatectomy; pancreatic enucleation; pancreaticoduodenectomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489304      PMCID: PMC6700012          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  117 in total

1.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy of a redo case combined with autologous islet transplantation for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Joseph Kuechle; Payam Salehi; Veronica Gorodner; Carlos Galvani; Enrico Benedetti; Jose Oberholzer
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery.

Authors:  W S Melvin; B J Needleman; K R Krause; C Schneider; R K Wolf; R E Michler; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy and nephrectomy for living donor pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Santiago Horgan; Carlos Galvani; Veronica Gorodner; Umberto Bareato; Fabrizio Panaro; Jose Oberholzer; Enrico Benedetti
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures.

Authors:  M A Talamini; S Chapman; S Horgan; W S Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme.

Authors:  Wande B Pratt; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Renyi Qin; Michael L Kendrick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Rowan W Parks; Yinmo Yang; Jin He; Taiping Zhang; Yiping Mou; Xianjun Yu; Bing Peng; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ho-Seong Han; Jae Hoon Lee; Michiaki Unno; Steven W M Olde Damink; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Pierce Chow; Tan To Cheung; Nim Choi; Yu-Wen Tien; Chengfeng Wang; Manson Fok; Xiujun Cai; Shengquan Zou; Shuyou Peng; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Trends in pancreatic surgery in Switzerland: a survey and nationwide analysis over two decades.

Authors:  Christoph Kuemmerli; Marcel André Schneider; Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; Beat Moeckli; Kristjan Ukegjini; Martin Bolli; Mathias Worni; Dominique Lisa Birrer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: surgical and oncological outcomes from pilot experience.

Authors:  Jiabin Jin; Shih-Min Yin; Yuanchi Weng; Mengmin Chen; Yusheng Shi; Xiayang Ying; Georgios Gemenetzis; Kai Qin; Jun Zhang; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation.

Authors:  Charlotte Friederieke Müller-Debus; Michael Thomaschewski; Markus Zimmermann; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-17

5.  Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jiabin Jin; Yusheng Shi; Mengmin Chen; Jianfeng Qian; Kai Qin; Zhen Wang; Wei Chen; Weiwei Jin; Fengchun Lu; Zheyong Li; Zehua Wu; Li Jian; Bing Han; Xiao Liang; Chuandong Sun; Zheng Wu; Yiping Mou; Xiaoyu Yin; Heguang Huang; Hao Chen; Georgios Gemenetzis; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery in the elderly patient: experiences from a high-volume centre.

Authors:  Karl H Hillebrandt; Sebastian Knitter; Lea Timmermann; Matthäus Felsenstein; Christian Benzing; Moritz Schmelzle; Johann Pratschke; Thomas Malinka
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Up-regulation of S100P predicts the poor long-term survival and construction of prognostic signature for survival and immunotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wenbo Zou; Lincheng Li; Zizheng Wang; Nan Jiang; Fei Wang; Minggen Hu; Rong Liu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Effectiveness and stability of robot-assisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sung Eun Park; Ho Joong Choi; Young Kyoung You; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 9.  The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Kohei Nakata; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 10.  Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Jim Khan; Francesco Marchegiani; Giorgio Bianchi; Filippo Aisoni; Daniele Alberti; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Graziano Ceccarelli; Federico Coccolini; Enrico Cicuttin; Mathieu D'Hondt; Salomone Di Saverio; Michele Diana; Belinda De Simone; Eloy Espin-Basany; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Jeffry Kashuk; Ewout Kouwenhoven; Ari Leppaniemi; Nassiba Beghdadi; Riccardo Memeo; Marco Milone; Ernest Moore; Andrew Peitzmann; Patrick Pessaux; Manos Pikoulis; Michele Pisano; Frederic Ris; Massimo Sartelli; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Michael Sugrue; Edward Tan; Paschalis Gavriilidis; Dieter Weber; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.