Literature DB >> 29581682

Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

A R Mohammadzade1,2, F Esmaili1.   

Abstract

The laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard to treat gallstone. To view the surgical site in this type of operations better, carbon dioxide is used with a certain pressure. The current study aimed to compare the hemodynamic symptoms and the level of abdominal pain due to using high- and low-pressure carbon dioxide in patients undergoing LC. The current double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with the age range of 20-70 years old undergoing LC. The first and second groups experienced PaCO2 of 7-10 and 12-14 mmHg, respectively. The hemodynamic symptoms, abdominal pain, shoulder-tip pain, nausea and vomiting after the surgery, and the mean of liver function tests were evaluated. Data were analyzed using T test, Chi-square test, and repeated measures ANOVA by SPSS 16. Information of 60 patients in two groups was analyzed. There was a significant difference between the groups regarding the mean of systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). The mean of heart rate was significantly higher in the high-pressure group during surgery and 1 h after that (P < 0.05). The frequency of pain in shoulder-tip and abdomen was higher in the high-pressure group. Frequency of nausea and vomiting 12 h after the surgery between two groups was significant (P < 0.05). The mean of alkaline phosphatase was higher in the low-pressure group than the high-pressure group (P < 0.05). Considering the good performance and low side effects of low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to those of high-pressure, this method can be replaced by high-pressure in LC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gallstone; High-pressure pneumoperitoneum; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum

Year:  2016        PMID: 29581682      PMCID: PMC5866798          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-016-1552-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  13 in total

1.  Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mikael Johansson; A Thune; A Blomqvist; L Nelvin; L Lundell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Metabolic and respiratory changes after cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy.

Authors:  J Joris; I Cigarini; M Legrand; N Jacquet; D De Groote; P Franchimont; M Lamy
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth S Chok; Wai Key Yuen; Hung Lau; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  End-tidal carbon dioxide tension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Correlation with the baseline value prior to carbon dioxide insufflation.

Authors:  A Baraka; S Jabbour; R Hammoud; M Aouad; F Najjar; G Khoury; A Sibai
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: the effect of a change in management.

Authors:  W Van der Linden; G Edlund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparative study of low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Deepaesh Benjamin Kanwer; Lileswar Kaman; M Nedounsejiane; Bikash Medhi; Ganga Ram Verma; Indu Bala
Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

7.  Randomized, prospective comparison of postoperative pain in low- versus high-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Mahmut Koc; Tamer Ertan; Mesut Tez; M Ali Kocpinar; Mehmet Kilic; Erdal Gocmen; A Kessaf Aslar
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Randomized trial of low-pressure carbon dioxide-elicited pneumoperitoneum versus abdominal wall lifting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yih-Huei Uen; Yi Chen; Chen-Yi Kuo; Kuo-Chang Wen; Lok-Beng Koay
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.743

9.  ["Low-pressure" laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high risk patients (ASA III and IV): our experience].

Authors:  Marco Catani; Renato Guerricchio; Ritanna De Milito; Sante Capitano; Massimo Chiaretti; Andrea Guerricchio; Gianluca Manili; Mario Simi
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  Pregabalin and gabapentin for post-photorefractive keratectomy pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Pakravan; Maryam Roshani; Shahin Yazdani; Amir Faramazi; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Changes and Shoulder Tip Pain Under Standard Pressure Versus Low-pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Apoorv Goel; Shalabh Gupta; Tripta S Bhagat; Prakhar Garg
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2019 Jan-Jun

Review 2.  Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Giulia Montori; Alberto Sartori; Andrea Balla; Emanuele Botteri; Giacomo Piatto; Gaetano Gallo; Silvia Vigna; Mario Guerrieri; Sophie Williams; Mauro Podda; Ferdinando Agresta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.