Literature DB >> 20306755

Comparative study of low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a randomised controlled trial.

Deepaesh Benjamin Kanwer1, Lileswar Kaman, M Nedounsejiane, Bikash Medhi, Ganga Ram Verma, Indu Bala.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy employs a pressure range of 12-14 mm Hg. An emerging trend has been the use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in the range of 7-10 mm Hg in an attempt to lower the impact of pneumoperitoneum on the human physiology while providing adequate working space. Our study proposes to compare the use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with the use of standard pressure pneumoperitoneum.
METHODS: A randomised controlled trial consisting of 60 patients with symptomatic gallstone disease who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, of which 30 patients were subjected to standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during the procedure and 30 patients to low pressure pneumoperitoneum.
RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in all aspects. The mean operating time with low pressure pneumoperitoneum was 49.07 +/- 5.72 minutes and with standard pressure pneumoperitoneum was 46.43 +/- 6.92 minutes. There was no statistically significant change in blood pressure, heart rate, pain at 6 hours, need for additional analgesia or shoulder tip pain with the use of lower pressure pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSIONS: Low pressure pneumoperitoneum benefits the patient in the form of lower intensity of postoperative pain but it does not positively impact intraoperative hemodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20306755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0250-636X


  14 in total

1.  The effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and anesthetic requirement during bis-spectral index-guided total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Park; Jong Yeop Kim; Sang Hyun Cho; Dongchul Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial.

Authors:  Elliot Gin; Darren Lowen; Mark Tacey; Russell Hodgson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Does hypocapnia before and during carbon dioxide insufflation attenuate the hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mohamed R El-Tahan; Noha D Al Dossary; Hatem El Emam; Douaa G Diab; Abdulhadi Al'Saflan; Haitham Zien; Mona Al Ahmadey; Afrah Deria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Azarudeen Jalaludeen; Virinder Bansal; Asuri Krishna; Subodh Kumar; Rajeshwari Subramanium; Rashmi Ramachandran; Mahesh Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Shoulder Tip Pain Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-a Randomized Control Study to Determine the Cause.

Authors:  Ashish Dey; Vinod K Malik
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A R Mohammadzade; F Esmaili
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Kees C J H M van Laarhoven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Sjaak Pouwels; Kim E Wever; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Anesthesiologic effects of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Dal Moro; Alessandro Crestani; Claudio Valotto; Andrea Guttilla; Rodolfo Soncin; Angelo Mangano; Filiberto Zattoni
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Pain relief from combined wound and intraperitoneal local anesthesia for patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Chun-Nan Yeh; Chun-Yi Tsai; Chi-Tung Cheng; Shang-Yu Wang; Yu-Yin Liu; Kun-Chun Chiang; Feng-Jen Hsieh; Chih-Chung Lin; Yi-Yin Jan; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.