Literature DB >> 17277653

Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Kenneth S Chok1, Wai Key Yuen, Hung Lau, Sheung Tat Fan.   

Abstract

Inpatient low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LPLC) has been shown to have less postoperative pain (especially shoulder-tip pain). No report so far has documented the use of lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A prospective randomized trial was conducted in Tung Wah Hospital, Day Surgery Centre from January 2004 to December 2004. A total of 40 patients were recruited and 20 of whom were allocated to each arm. Outcome measures included operation time, treatment-related morbidity, mortality, postoperative pain (eg, shoulder-tip pain), consumption of analgesics, and level of satisfaction. All patients in both groups could be discharged on the same day. Patients' demographics and operation time were comparable in both groups. There were no treatment-related morbidity and mortality, nor was there any significant difference in postoperative pain. Less shoulder-tip pain was observed in the LPLC group though without significant difference (5% vs. 20%; P=0.151). Three patients in the LPLC group needed higher insufflation pressure (12 mm Hg) because of inadequate exposure and adhesions, and the operations were successful in all of them. Otherwise, no conversion to open procedure was noted in both groups. The consumption of analgesics was minimal and a high level of satisfaction was achieved in both groups of patients. The present study demonstrated no difference in LPLC and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the outcomes of outpatient LC. Routine use of lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient LC would not be recommended unless in selected straightforward cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17277653     DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213748.00525.1e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  14 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of interventions to facilitate ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yeri Ahn; Jennifer Woods; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Azarudeen Jalaludeen; Virinder Bansal; Asuri Krishna; Subodh Kumar; Rajeshwari Subramanium; Rashmi Ramachandran; Mahesh Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Responsiveness of quality of life instruments for the comparison of minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Leili Shahgholi Ghahfarokhi; Pamela Skaran; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparing Hemodynamic Symptoms and the Level of Abdominal Pain in High- Versus Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A R Mohammadzade; F Esmaili
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Tiwari; Ashutosh Chauhan; Pallab Chaterjee; Mohammed T Alam
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 7.  What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Kees C J H M van Laarhoven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Sjaak Pouwels; Kim E Wever; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jan Paul J Mulier; Bruno Dillemans; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline for minimally invasive surgery.: Part 1: entry techniques and the pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Claire F la Chapelle; Willem A Bemelman; Bart M P Rademaker; Teus A van Barneveld; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-02-22

Review 10.  Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Esther B Kyle; Sarah Maheux-Lacroix; Amélie Boutin; Philippe Y Laberge; Madeleine Lemyre
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.