BACKGROUND: The detailed mechanism of osseointegration, the most appropriate implant-bone interface, remains unclear in jaw tissues at the ultrastructural level in contrast to the many reports using long bones. The present study reports on tissue response to titanium-implantation on an animal model using rat maxilla. METHODS: Animals were sacrificed at 1 to 28 days post-implantation and prepared tissue specimens, freed from implants by a cryofracture technique, were processed for transmission electron microscopy and histochemistry for tartrate resistant acid phosphatase activity (TRAPase). RESULTS: Different patterns in bone formation were recognized between lateral and base areas of implant cavities. In the lateral area with narrow gaps, bone deposition took place from the pre-existing bone towards the implant after active bone resorption by osteoclasts reactive to TRAPase. However, no distinct bone formation appeared in the lateral area where the implant had been installed close to the osteotomy margin. On the other hand, new bone formation was found at the base area without any apparent bone resorption. Interestingly, mononuclear cells reactive to TRAPase, presumably preosteoclasts, frequently occurred near preosteoblasts. Osseointegration around the implants was obtained in this model by 28 days post-implantation except for the lateral area with complete contact with implants, where the thin layer remained in contact with the implant surface. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ossification proceeds at different modes around the titanium implant in rat maxilla, depending on the nature of the recipient bones and the dimension of the gap between the implant and osteotomy margin.
BACKGROUND: The detailed mechanism of osseointegration, the most appropriate implant-bone interface, remains unclear in jaw tissues at the ultrastructural level in contrast to the many reports using long bones. The present study reports on tissue response to titanium-implantation on an animal model using rat maxilla. METHODS: Animals were sacrificed at 1 to 28 days post-implantation and prepared tissue specimens, freed from implants by a cryofracture technique, were processed for transmission electron microscopy and histochemistry for tartrate resistant acid phosphatase activity (TRAPase). RESULTS: Different patterns in bone formation were recognized between lateral and base areas of implant cavities. In the lateral area with narrow gaps, bone deposition took place from the pre-existing bone towards the implant after active bone resorption by osteoclasts reactive to TRAPase. However, no distinct bone formation appeared in the lateral area where the implant had been installed close to the osteotomy margin. On the other hand, new bone formation was found at the base area without any apparent bone resorption. Interestingly, mononuclear cells reactive to TRAPase, presumably preosteoclasts, frequently occurred near preosteoblasts. Osseointegration around the implants was obtained in this model by 28 days post-implantation except for the lateral area with complete contact with implants, where the thin layer remained in contact with the implant surface. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ossification proceeds at different modes around the titanium implant in rat maxilla, depending on the nature of the recipient bones and the dimension of the gap between the implant and osteotomy margin.
Authors: Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Noboru Kikuchi; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Hyunhee Ahn; Ravi R Patel; Anthony J Hoyt; Angela S P Lin; F Brennan Torstrick; Robert E Guldberg; Carl P Frick; R Dana Carpenter; Christopher M Yakacki; Nick J Willett Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2018-03-18 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Kasra Zainali; Gorm Danscher; Thomas Jakobsen; Jorgen Baas; Per Møller; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 4.396